SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 5567 of 2025 ==========================================================
RINKESH RAJENDRABHAI SHAH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MALAY S PATEL(8901) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 18/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MALAY S PATEL(8901) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court may grant bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, considering the nature of the offence and ensuring conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The applicant sought bail in connection with a serious offence involving over a hundred victims, where the applicant and co-accused collected substantial amounts for visa and work permits - The court considered the nature of the allegations and previous decisions regarding bail for the applicant - The investigation is complete, and a charge-sheet has been filed - The court found it appropriate to exercise discretion in favor of granting bail with specific conditions. (Paras 2, 5, 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court imposed conditions to ensure the applicant does not misuse liberty, obstruct investigations, or leave the state without permission. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is involved in a case with multiple victims where substantial amounts were collected for visa and work permits. The applicant has prior similar offences. The investigation is complete, and a charge-sheet has been filed.

Findings of Court:
The court found it appropriate to grant bail considering the nature of the allegations and previous bail decisions for the applicant.

Issues: The main issues were the nature of the offence, the applicant's prior conduct, and the appropriateness of granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the completion of the investigation and the nature of the allegations, it was fit to exercise discretion in granting bail while imposing necessary conditions to safeguard the prosecution's interests.

Result: The present application is allowed.

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NOS.11196012230579 of 2023 registered with Fatehganj Police Station, Vadodara City.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter-alia, contending that the present applicant has actively participated in the offence in question. There are more than hundred victims in the present offence. The present applicant and co-accused who happened to be father of the present applicant had collected a big amount for visa and work permit. He further submitted that the applicant has other antecedent of similar nature. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. From the records, it appears that for the very nature of offence and the transactions, the different FIRs have been filed by the different victims. In other offences, the Coordinate Bench of this Court has been pleased to consider the case of the present applicant for grant of regular bail.

6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.  

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top