2025 Supreme(GUJ) 640
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 5421 of 2025 ==========================================================
SANJAYGIRI @ SANJU RAMESHGIRI GOSWAMI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ABHAYKUMAR P SHAH(3093) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 17/03/2025
Important Points
Subject
Criminal Law - Bail
Headnote
(B) Bail - Conditions imposed - Applicant must not misuse liberty, obstruct investigation, surrender passport, and mark presence at police station monthly - Court retains discretion to modify conditions. (Paras 8, 10)
Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of subjecting the deceased to physical and mental torture during their short marriage of 8 months, with allegations preventing her from visiting her parental home.
Findings of Court:
The court finds it appropriate to grant bail considering the nature of allegations and the ongoing investigation, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure compliance and protect the investigation.
Issues: The main issues addressed include the nature of the allegations against the applicant and the appropriateness of granting bail under the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that, given the ongoing investigation and the nature of the allegations, it is within its discretion to grant bail while imposing necessary conditions to safeguard the investigation and prevent misuse of liberty.
Result: Application for bail allowed.
ORDER :
(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11205031250039 of 2025 registered with Mandavi Police Station, Kachchh West-Bhuj
3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. The married life between the deceased and her husband was merely of 8 months. The applicant herein happens to be the father-in-law of the deceased and there is an allegation that the present applicant had subjected the deceased to physical and mental torture and she was also not allowed to visit her parental house. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.
5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. The applicant herein happens to be the father-in-law of the deceased. The allegations levelled against the present applicant is to the effect that he along with other co-accused did not allow the deceased to visit her parental house and was subjected to physical and mental torture.
6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;
(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;
(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;
9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.
11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct service is permitted.