IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 5092 of 2025 ==========================================================
HABIBBHAI @ ABDUL @ ABALO IBRAHIMBHAI SANDH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VIRAT G POPAT(3710) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS SHIVANGI D MADHAD(13116) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS KRINA CALLA, APP for the Respondent No.1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 12/03/2025
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11203068240239 of 2024 registered with Vanthali Police Station. Junagadh.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that there was a previous enmity between two groups and therefore the incident alleged in the FIR had taken place. The role attributed to the present applicant in commission of the offence is to the effect that the applicant was present at the scene of offence armed with an iron rod. The present applicant was also assigned a task of keeping a watch over the movement of the deceased. Thus there is an active participation on part of the present applicant in commission of the offence in question. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.
6. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and perused the record. From the record it appears that the investigation is over and charge- sheet has been filed. The only role attributed to the present applicant in commission of the offence is to the effect that the applicant was keeping watch over the movement of the deceased and was even present at the scene of offence at the time of incident. The present applicant was armed with an iron road. The present applicant is aged around 75 years. Considering the same, the application deserves consideration.
7. This court has considered the following aspects:
(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.
(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.
(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 16.10.2024.
(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.
8. Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and perusing the record produced in this case as well as taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of accusation, availability of the Applicant Accused at the time of Trial etc. and the role attributed to the present Applicant accused, the present Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly stands allowed. This Court has also gone through the FIR and police papers and also the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Court where the learned Sessions Judge has disallowed the bail Application at initial stage. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that the applicant shall:
(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.
(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.
(c) furnish the docum
The court granted bail considering the applicant's age and the nature of allegations, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation of bail conditions.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's age and lack of flight risk, emphasizing the need for strict compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the crime, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court ruled that prolonged incarceration without trial progress warrants bail, emphasizing the importance of timely justice.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of the offence and the applicant's compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court may grant bail after considering the gravity of the offense, the applicant's history of absconding, and the conditions necessary to ensure trial attendance.
The court ruled that bail may be granted considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's role in the offense, and the absence of direct fatal involvement.
The court granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's willingness to comply with conditions, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public interest.
The court established that bail may be granted when continued detention is unjustified, considering the nature of allegations and evidence presented.
The court emphasized evaluating contradictions in witness statements and the gravity of charges when considering bail applications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.