IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 25322 of 2024 ==========================================================
KASHYAP @ SONU KEPSAN NETLEKAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MOUSAM R YAGNIK(3689) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR A N ANJARIA(13538) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR. KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 18/03/2025
ORDER :
(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191040242452 of 2024 registered with Sardar Nagar Police Station, Ahmedabad.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned APP for the Respondent – State and learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Original Complainant.
3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State and learned Advocate Mr. A.N.Anjaria waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Original Complainant.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the age of the victim was merely 12 Years at the relevant time of the incident. The Applicant had subjected the said victim to sexual assault and had committed the act with him without his consent. Learned APP has therefore submitted that looking to the nature of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the Application may be dismissed.
6. Learned Advocate Mr. A.N.Anjaria appearing on behalf of the Original Complainant has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and he has no objection if the Applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail. He therefore submitted to pass appropriate order.
7. Heard learned Advocates for the parties and perused the record. From the record it appears that the Applicant is alleged to have subjected the victim to sexual assault. However, in the statment of the victim recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. the victim has not referred to any untoward incident having taken place with him at the hands of the present Applicant. Considering these aspects, the Application deserves consideration. This court has also considered the following aspects:
(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.
(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.
(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 20.12.2024.
(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.
8. Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and perusing the record produced in this case as well as taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of accusation, availability of the Applicant Accused at the time of Trial etc. and the role attributed to the present Applicant accused, the present Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly stands allowed. This Court has also gone through the FIR and police papers and also the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Court where the learned Sessions Judge has disallowed the bail Application at initial stage. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that he shall:
(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.
(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.
(
The court granted bail based on the absence of corroborative evidence from the victim's statement and the Applicant's compliance with conditions, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach in bail ....
The court granted bail based on the nature of allegations, the Applicant's compliance with conditions, and the absence of physical relations with the prosecutrix.
The court emphasized the balance between the severity of the offence and the rights of the accused, allowing bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the victims' stable condition.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's relationship with the victim, and the absence of flight risk, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure compliance.
Bail may be granted even in serious offences if the applicant shows compliance willingness and no flight risk, emphasizing the need for a balanced assessment of case facts.
The court granted bail based on the consensual nature of the relationship and the complainant's lack of objection, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's custody duration, nature of allegations, and lack of flight risk, emphasizing the need for compliance with imposed conditions.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's custody duration, the nature of allegations, and the lack of evidence suggesting flight risk or witness tampering.
The court determined that the applicant's non-involvement in inflicting injury and lack of flight risk justified granting bail despite the serious nature of the offence.
The court granted bail based on the consensual nature of the relationship between the applicant and the minor victim, emphasizing the need for discretion in such cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.