HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
SACHIN GANESH GIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11210045250200 of 2025 registered with Pandesara Police Station, Surat.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
4. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. The Applicant herein had assaulted the two victims and had given them blows with sword because of which the victims had sustained severe injuries. Learned APP has therefore submitted that looking to the nature of offence, this
The court emphasized the balance between the severity of the offence and the rights of the accused, allowing bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the victims' stable condition.
The court determined that the applicant's non-involvement in inflicting injury and lack of flight risk justified granting bail despite the serious nature of the offence.
Bail may be granted even in serious offences if the applicant shows compliance willingness and no flight risk, emphasizing the need for a balanced assessment of case facts.
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's limited role in the alleged crime, good reputation, and absence of risk of flight or witness tampering.
The court emphasized that bail may be granted if the applicant shows no flight risk and the investigation is complete, while imposing strict conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the crime, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's reputation, duration of custody, and similarity to a co-accused's case, emphasizing the need for conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's circumstances, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent witness tampering and maintain law and order.
The court ruled that prolonged incarceration without trial progress warrants bail, emphasizing the importance of timely justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.