SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 490

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
RAVIKARAN @ KARAN MASTER CHOTELAL PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:JAYDEEP H SINDHI(9585) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11214046241721 of 2024 registered with Palsana Police Station, Surat

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant was already married at the relevant time. Despite being married, he had established physical relations with the prosecutrix without her consent. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. From the record, it appears that the present applicant and the prosecutrix were working together in a textile unit. The material available on record indicates that the present applicant and the prosecutr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top