SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 628

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
ARBAZKHAN JAMIRKHAN PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11191032240335 of 2024 registered with Maninagar Police Station, Ahmedabad. 

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant had established physical relations with the prosecutrix on the basis of false promise to marry her. The applicant had also obtained some money from the prosecutrix and had also captured the intimate moments between them on the mobile-phone and on the basis of the same, he used to blackmail the prosecutrix. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. Learned advocate for the original complainant has also opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the applicant never had an intention to marry the prosec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top