SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 773

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
ISMAILBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI SANDH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 6367 of 2025



Petitioner Advocates:MR VIRAT G POPAT(3710) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court granted bail considering the applicant's age and lack of flight risk, emphasizing the need for strict compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The applicant, aged around 70 years, seeks bail in connection with FIR involving alleged active participation in a crime. The court considered the nature of allegations and the applicant's role in the incident - The applicant has been in custody since 16.5.2024. (Paras 2, 6, 7, 8)

(B) Bail considerations - The court outlined factors including prima facie case, presence at trial, and risk of tampering with witnesses, as per established legal principles. (Para 7)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of being present at the scene of a crime while armed and tasked with watching the deceased, amidst prior enmity between groups.

Findings of Court:
The application for bail is allowed with conditions to ensure compliance and prevent tampering with evidence.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the allegations and his age.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to balance the severity of accusations with the applicant's age and the nature of his involvement, allowing bail while imposing strict conditions.

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.

2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11203068240239 of 2024 registered with Vanthali Police Station. Junagadh.

3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that there was a previous enmity between two groups and therefore the incident alleged in the FIR had taken place. The role attributed to the present applicant in commission of the offence is to the effect that the applicant was present at the scene of offence armed with a wooden log. The present applicant was also assigned a task of keeping a watch over the movement of the deceased. Thus there is an active participation on part of the present applicant in commission of the offence in question. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and perused the record. From the record it appears that the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The only role attributed to the present applicant in commission of the offence is to the effect that the applicant was keeping watch over the movement of the deceased and was even present at the scene of offence at the time of incident. The present applicant was armed with a wooden log. The present applicant is aged around 70 years. Considering the same, the application deserves consideration.

7. This court has considered the following aspects:

(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.

(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.

(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 16.5.2024.

(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

8. Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and perusing the record produced in this case as well as taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of accusation, availability of the Applicant Accused at the time of Trial etc. and the role attributed to the present Applicant accused, the present Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly stands allowed. This Court has also gone through the FIR and police papers and also the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Court where the learned Sessions Judge has disallowed the bail Application at initial stage. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that the applicant shall:

(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.

(c) furnish the documentary proof of co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top