SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 539

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
JAGMALJI BHUPATJI PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR PRATIK B BAROT(3711) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.

2. The Applicants have filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicants on Regular Bail in connection with common FIR being C.R. No.11195009240465 of 2024 registered with Chhapi Police Station. Banaskantha.

3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicants submitted that the Applicants have good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicants are ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present applications for grant of regular bail contending that there is an active participation on part of the present applicants in commission of the offence in question. The applicants have looted the first informant of the valuable muddamal articles when they were plying in a bus. The muddamal articles have also been recov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top