SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 525

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
VAGHARI VINODBHAI RAMESHBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR MUNJAL V ACHARYA(10678) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11204028240199 of 2024 registered with Kapadwanj Rural Police Station, Kheda.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the age of the prosecutrix was below 18 years at the relevant time. Moreover, the applicant happens to be the real brother-in-law (Banevi) of the prosecutrix. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. Pursuant to service of notice, the original complainant viz. Arunaben Vinodbhai Vaghari is present before the Court and submits that she has no objection, if the present applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail. She, therefore, submitted to pass an appropriate order.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top