SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO.
4229 of 2025 ==========================================================
LAKHIRAM NARANDAS DEVMURARI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUDHANSHU A JHA(8345) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 19/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:SUDHANSHU A JHA(8345) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Anticipatory bail granted based on applicant's cooperation in investigation and absence of prior convictions, emphasizing judicial discretion in bail matters.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 465, 467, 471, and 120

(B) - Anticipatory bail application - Applicant joined investigation and has no past antecedents; co-accused granted bail - Respondent opposed bail citing lack of cooperation - Court emphasized discretion in bail matters considering nature of accusation and applicant's conduct. (Paras 1.0, 4.0, 5.0)

(B) Bail - Factors to consider - Nature and gravity of accusation, antecedents of applicant, possibility of fleeing from justice, and potential for humiliation through arrest. (Paras 4.0)

Facts of the case:
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR for serious offences, asserting cooperation with the investigation and lack of prior convictions.

Findings of Court:
The application for anticipatory bail was allowed, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with the investigation.

Issues: The main issues included the applicant's cooperation in the investigation and the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's willingness to cooperate and absence of prior convictions justified the grant of anticipatory bail, while emphasizing the need for careful judicial discretion.

Result: Application allowed.

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,  J.) 

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-23 of 2017 registered with Babra Police Station, District Amreli for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has joined the investigation and even he is ready and willing to join the further investigation. Hence, now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicant and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Even, the similarly situated co-accused are granted anticipatory bail and even the applicant is not having any past antecedent. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

[3.0] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail on the ground that applicant has joined the investigation half-heartedly and has not cooperated in the investigation and therefore, he has requested to dismiss the present application.

[4.0] Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation papers, it is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are (i) the nature and gravity of the accusation; (ii) the antecedents of the applicant including the fact as to whether he has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence; (iii) the possibility of the applicant to flee from justice; and (iv) where the accusation has been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by having him so arrested. Though at the stage of granting bail an elaborate examination of evidence and detailed reasons touching the merit of the case, which may prejudice the accused, should be avoided. I have considered the following aspects.

(1) Offence is not punishable with life imprisonment or death penalty;

(2) Applicant has joined the investigation and even he is ready to join further investigation;

(3) No case for custodial interrogation is made out;

(4) Even considering the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar reported in (2014)8 SCC 273; Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022)10 SCC 51 and Md. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and Another reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 892. 

[5.0] Considering the aforesaid aspects and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Asha Dubey vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh rendered in Criminal Appeal No.4564 of 2024 as well as in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. reported in (2011) 1 SCC 6941, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. reported in (1980) 2 SCC 665 and also the decision in the case of Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2020) 5 SCC 1, I am inclined to allow the present application.

[6.0] In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of arrest / appearance of the applicant in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-23 of 2017 registered with Babra Police Station, District Amreli, the applicant shall be released

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top