SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 866

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
NSK
GIRDHARLAL MOHANLAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR RUTVIJ M BHATT(2697) ,Respondent Advocate: GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. R.M. Bhatt for the petitioner and learned AGP Mr. Jayneel Parikh for the respondent No.1 State.

2. Learned advocate Mr. Chitrajeet Upadhyay with learned advocate Mr. Param Dave have requested permission to appear on behalf of the respondent No.5 and whereas an affidavit in reply is filed, the same is ordered to be taken on record. Learned advocate has been permitted to make submissions.

3. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged an order dated 12.02.2025, whereby the Mamlatdar, Tarapur, has reduced / corrected the extent of land held by the petitioner in 7/12 extract in so far as land of the petitioner is concerned.

4. Since it appears to this Court that the petitioner may not have been given a fair opportunity before the order impugned was passed and whereas upon a broad consensus being arrived at, more particularly the State being inclined to take an appropriate decision after affording an opportunity to the petitioner and to such person, who would be affected basis any order that would be passed by the Mamlatdar, to this Court, the following directions would meet with the ends of justice:

(a) The order dated 12.02.2025 passed by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top