SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 2335 of 2025 ==========================================================
SAJID @ NAVSAD RASULAKHA @ MAHEBUBKHA KALOYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR P S DATTA(11324) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR MUNJAL V ACHARYA(10678) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR. MEET THAKKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 26/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR P S DATTA(11324) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court exercised discretion to grant bail based on the limited role of the applicant in aiding co-accused, emphasizing the completion of the investigation.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The applicant is accused of aiding co-accused in the commission of an offence - The investigation is complete, and a charge-sheet has been filed - The court finds that the applicant's role is limited to providing assistance and considers the nature of allegations - The court cites the principle from Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, [2012] 1 SCC 40 regarding the discretion to grant bail. (Paras 2, 6, 8, 9)

(B) Bail Conditions - The applicant is granted bail subject to conditions including not misusing liberty, not entering the area of Taluka Maliya Hatina, and marking presence at the police station monthly. (Paras 9)

Facts of the case:
The applicant seeks bail in connection with an FIR for aiding co-accused in a crime, with the investigation concluded and charge-sheet filed.

Findings of Court:
The court finds it appropriate to grant bail based on the limited role attributed to the applicant.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant's actions warranted bail given the nature of the allegations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised discretion to grant bail, emphasizing the limited role of the applicant and the completion of the investigation.

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11203036230129 of 2023 registered with Maliya Hatina Police Station, Junagadh.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence and the fact that the allegation against the present applicant is only of extending help to the accused, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the applicant had participated in commission of offence, as he had helped the other co-accused. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. Learned advocate for the respondent No.2/complainant also joined the learned APP to request the Court not to allow the present application of the applicant.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The only role attributed to the present applicant is of helping the other co-accused persons in commission of the offence-in-question.

7. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not enter in the area of Taluka Maliya Hatina till the conclusion of trial.

(c) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(d) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(e) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(f) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(g) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

10. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

12. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

13. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top