HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
IJV, SNB
JAY @ JALO HARSHADBHAI BHOI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
ILESH J. VORA, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent-State. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.
2. We have heard Mr. Aamir Pathan, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Jay Mehta, learned APP for the respondent-State.
3. By way of this application under Section 389(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, applicant Jay @ Jalo Harshadbhai Bhoi seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the Sessions Court concerned for the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w. Section 34 of the IPC.
4. The present appeal and the application for suspension of sentence arise from the judgment dated 02.12.2022 and order of sentence passed in Sessions Case No.128 of 2021, whereby, the applicant herein was convicted and sentenced as under:
(i) Section 302 r/w. Section 34 of IPC: R.I. for Life and fine of Rs.5,000/-;
5. Facts and circumstances giving rise to file appeal as well as this application are that on the date of occurrence, deceased had indulged into gambling activity with the accused persons behind a Primary School at Village Bharda. The deceased asked for sum of Rs.100/- from the accused no.1 and the accused no.1 had given an assurance that he will
The principle of parity allows for suspension of sentence when the roles of co-accused are considered, leading to a favorable decision for the applicant.
The principle of parity allows for the suspension of a sentence when the applicant's role in the crime is less severe than that of the principal accused.
The principle of parity justifies the suspension of sentence when the roles of the accused are similar, allowing for appeal considerations.
The principle of parity applies in suspension of sentence cases when co-accused have similar roles and durations of imprisonment.
The court may suspend a sentence during the appeal process if the applicant has served a significant portion of the sentence and no exceptional circumstances exist to deny such suspension.
The court may suspend a sentence if the applicant demonstrates insufficient evidence of involvement in the crime, allowing for bail pending appeal.
The court may suspend a sentence if the conviction appears to be against the evidence and established legal principles.
The court ruled that the injuries inflicted were not intended to cause death, indicating culpable homicide rather than murder, thus justifying the suspension of sentence.
Suspension of sentence granted due to contradictions in witness statements and lack of evidence linking the applicant to the crime.
The court may suspend sentences based on the age and health of the accused, especially when incarceration has been prolonged and appeals are unlikely to be heard soon.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.