SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 933

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 4596 of 2025 =============================================
ANIL SATYANARAYAN PRAJAPATI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT =============================================
Appearance:
MS. MAYURI P CHAUHAN(7069) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS DHWANI TRIPATHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 =============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO Date : 21/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MS. MAYURI P CHAUHAN(7069) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court emphasized the right to legal aid for under-trials and the necessity of timely legal representation in criminal proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 346 - Legal Aid Defence Counsel System - The applicant sought to withdraw the application due to prolonged adjournments without legal representation. The court noted the failure to provide legal aid to the applicant and co-accused, who have been under trial since October 2022, and directed the provision of legal counsel. (Paras 3 and 4)

(B) Right to Legal Aid - The court emphasized the necessity of informing under-trials about their right to legal aid and the importance of conducting trials with sensitivity towards their situation. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The applicant and co-accused were not represented by an advocate during numerous adjournments in Session Case No. 71 of 2023, leading to a delay in the trial process.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the provision of legal aid to the applicant and co-accused and expected the trial court to handle the case with sensitivity.

Issues: The main issues included the lack of legal representation for the applicant and co-accused and the need for timely legal aid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to provide legal aid and the casual handling of the case violated the rights of the under-trials, necessitating immediate action to rectify the situation.

Result: Application disposed of as withdrawn.

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for the respondent – State.

2. After arguing the matter some time, learned advocate Ms.Mayuri Chauhan for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application. Permission, as payed for, is granted.

3. Learned Advocate Ms.Mayuri P Chauhan for the applicant has submitted a copy of the rojkam of Session Case No. 71 of 2023 and on perusal of the same, it appears that the matter was allotted to the Session Court for the first time on 02.02.2023. The applicant and co accused were produced before the learned Sessions Court and as the applicant and the co-accused did not engage an advocate, the matter has been adjourned on innumerable dates and is kept pending for engagement of an advocate till 01.02.2025. The rojkam reflects that the the applicant and the co-accused were not produced before the learned Trial Court on many adjournments and not a single application to engage a private advocate has been preferred by the applicant or co-accused on any date, but the matter has been adjourned for engaging an advocate. On 23.05.2023 the learned APP was heard for framing of charge, and even though, there was no advocate representing the applicant and the co accused, the charge was framed and the statements of the applicant and other co-accused was recorded. It is painful to note that though there is a Legal Aid Defence Counsel System in each Court establishment, no advocate from the Legal Aid Defence Counsel was provided to the applicant and co-accused even though they are under trials and in judicial custody since October, 2022. The matter has been simply adjourned in a very casual manner for almost two years without verifying whether the applicant and co-accused intend to engage a private advocate or not and without informing them about their right to legal aid from the Legal Aid Defence Counsel.

4. In view of this factual state on record, which is reflected in the rojkam of Session Case No. 71 of 2023, the Secretary, City Civil Legal Aid Committee, City Civil and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad is directed to do the needful to provide an advocate from the Legal Aid Defence Counsel to the applicant and co-accused at the earliest. It is also expected that the learned Trial Court will conduct the trial with utmost sensitivity keeping in mind that the applicant and other co-accused are under-trials since October, 2022 and the provisions of Section 346 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

5. The present application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top