SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 933

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SVP
ANIL SATYANARAYAN PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS. MAYURI P CHAUHAN(7069) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for the respondent – State.

2. After arguing the matter some time, learned advocate Ms.Mayuri Chauhan for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application. Permission, as payed for, is granted.

3. Learned Advocate Ms.Mayuri P Chauhan for the applicant has submitted a copy of the rojkam of Session Case No. 71 of 2023 and on perusal of the same, it appears that the matter was allotted to the Session Court for the first time on 02.02.2023. The applicant and co accused were produced before the learned Sessions Court and as the applicant and the co-accused did not engage an advocate, the matter has been adjourned on innumerable dates and is kept pending for engagement of an advocate till 01.02.2025. The rojkam reflects that the the applicant and the co-accused were not produced before the learned Trial Court on many adjournments and not a single application to engage a private advocate has been preferred by the applicant or co-accused on any date, but the matter has been adjourned for engaging an advocate. On 23.05.2023 the learned APP was heard for framing of charge, and even though, there was no advocate repr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top