IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HASMUKH D.SUTHAR
Sorathiya Hareshbhai Rameshbhai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.
Law is the king of kings, far more powerful and right than they; nothing can be mightier than law, by whose aid, as by that of the highest monarch, even the weak may prevail over the strong.
-- Brihadaranyakopanishad (1-4.14)
[1.0] RULE. Learned APP Ms. Shruti Pathak waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat. Learned advocate Ms. Kruti Shah waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.3 and learned advocate Mr. Ashish Dagli waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.4. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Bhargav Bhatt assisted by learned advocate Mr. S.B. Sikarwar for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Hardik Dave assisted by learned APP Ms. Shruti Pathak appearing for respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat, learned advocate Ms. Kruti Shah appearing for respondent No.3 and learned Senior Advocate Mr. I.H. Syed assisted by learned advocate Mr. Ashish Dagli for respondent No.4.
PROLOGUE:
[2.0] By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the petitioner, who is grands

Bilkis Yakub Rasool vs. Union of India
Union of India vs. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
Pyare Lal vs. State of Haryana
Laxman Naskar vs. Union of India
D.P. Chadha vs. Triyugi Narain Mishra & Ors.
State of Haryana & Others vs. Mohinder Singh
State of Haryana and Others Vs. Rajkumar @ Bittu
Swamy Shraddhananda (2) vs. State of Karnataka
Gopal Vinayak Godse v. The State of Maharashtra and others
Mansuklal Vithaldas Chauhan vs. State of Gujarat
Epuru Sudhakar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another vs. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
Sarat Chandra Rabha and Others vs. Khagendranath Nath and Others
Surya Baksh Singh vs. State of U.P.
Anita Kushwaha vs. Pushap Sudan
Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd. v. Federation of Noida Residents Welfare Association
Ashok Sadarangani and Another vs. Union of India and Others
Manager, National Insurance Company Limted vs. Saju P. Paul and Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.