Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S.SUPEHIA, R.T.VACHHANI
Gujarat Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Digvijaysinh Mahendrasinh Chavda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal procedure and relevant notifications (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. recruitment process and allocation of bonus marks (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding recruitment rules and qualifications (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. responses to arguments about bonus marks and eligibility (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. previous judgement relevance and ongoing appeal (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. analysis of recruitment criteria and discriminatory practices (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. court's finding on merit and process flaws (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. final orders and implications for recruitment process (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1895 is directed against the judgement and order dated 11.06.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in the captioned writ petition being Special Civil Application No.13587 of 2014 and allied matters.
2. The group of writ petitions, in which other issues are raised, is also decided by the learned Single Judge vide common judgement and order dated 11.06.2015. So far as the issue, which is raised in the captioned writ petition and appeal is concerned, the same is confined to the Notification dated 18.05.2009 is
The court ruled that recruitment practices must strictly adhere to rules without arbitrary deviations, ensuring fairness in selecting candidates based on established criteria.
The court reaffirmed that recruitment standards must be applied fairly and consistently, ensuring equal opportunity and adherence to established qualifications.
Gujarat Public Service Commission – Waiting list - It cannot be said that GPSC has committed any error in preparing select list and putting petitioners in wait list, as petitioners have secured marks....
(1) Advertisement, made pursuant to a notification, binds parties – It has got all trappings of a statutory prescription unless it becomes contrary to either a rule or an Act – Change can only be bro....
An administrative decision does not always require a statutory sanction. For instance, it is well settled that for holding interviews for selection/admissions shortlisting can be done, and it is not ....
The court upheld the validity of minimum qualifying marks for recruitment as a discretionary power of the Commission, emphasizing administrative fairness and the principle that participation in the p....
Minimum qualifying marks must be obtained in each subject rather than an aggregate score; changes to recruitment criteria cannot be made after the process has commenced.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
