SANJIV KHANNA, M. M. SUNDRESH
Sureshkumar Lalitkumar Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M. M. Sundresh, J.
1. Leave granted. Applications for impleadment are allowed.
2. The decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat giving its imprimatur to the decision of the Departmental Selection Committee in reducing the qualifying marks for the post of Supervisor Instructor Class III, after the publication of result to facilitate the inclusion of candidates constituting horizontal reservation, is under challenge in these civil appeals.
3. Heard Mr. P.S. Patwalia, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, Ms. Archana Dave Pathak, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel for the private respondents.
FACTS IN BRIEF:
4. Two advertisements were issued on 05.09.2015 to fill up the posts for Supervisor Instructor (Engineering Trade and Non-Engineering Trade) and Supervisor Instructor (Employability skill). The aforesaid two categories of posts carrying similar eligibility criteria in the nature of qualification with a difference in the respective degree required, including the sub-categories in the Engineering Group, such as Automobile, Chemical, Electrical, Mechanical, Marine etc. with a total of 13.
5. Prior
Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors. v. Rajasthan High Court & Ors. (2013) 4 SCC 540 – Referred [Para 19]
Veerendra Kumar Gautam & Ors. v. Karuna Nidhan Upadhyay & Ors.
Anupal Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Ors. (2008) 6 SCC 1 – Referred [Para 19]
N.T. Devin Katti v. Karnataka Public Service Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.