VIKRAM NATH, ASHUTOSH J.SHASTRI
Kanubhai Ramsingbhai Hathila – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. The neat point involved in the present two appeals is with regard to the powers of the Selection Committee to reduce the cut-off marks of different categories of posts at the time of verification of documents and preparation of the final select list.
2. Brief facts giving rise to the present dispute are as under:
2.1 A recruitment process was undertaken for selection to the post of Supervisor Instructor, Class-III in different Industrial Training Institutes in the State of Gujarat. Such selection is governed by the Rules known as Supervisor Instructor (Engineering Trade, Non- Engineering Trade), Class-III, Recruitment Rules, 2015.
2.2 An advertisement was issued in 2015 for filling up 1226 vacant posts of Supervisor Instructor (Engineering Trade, Non-Engineering Trade), Class-III. Apart from other conditions mentioned in the advertisement, it was provided that the cut-off marks for General Category would be 60%, for Socially and Educationally Backward Class, it would be 57% and for the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe, it would be 55%. It was further mentioned that any candidate obtaining less than the cut-off marks would not be eligible for appointment.
Aarti Gupta and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others
All India SC & ST Employees' Assn. v. A. Arthur Jeen
Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Tage Habung and others
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India
Barot Vijaykumar Balakrishna Vs. Modh Vinaykumar Dasrathlal
Batiarani Gramiya Bank v. Pallab Kumar
Bihar Public Service Commission v. State of Bihar
C. Channabasavaih v. State of Mysore
Divisional Forest Officer v. M. Ramalinga Reddy
Dr Rai Shivendra Bahadur v. Governing Body of the Nalanda College
Faridabad C.T. Scan Centre v. D.G., Health Services
Hanuman Prasad v. Union of India
Hemani Malhotra Vs. High Court of Delhi
Jalandhar Improvement Trust v. Sampuran Singh
Jatinder Kumar v. State of Punjab
K. Thulaseedharan v. Kerala State Public Service Commission
Kastha Niwarak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. President, Indore Development Authority
M.P. Public Service Commission v. Navnit Kumar Potdar
Maharashtra SRTC v. Rajendra Bhimrao Mandve
Mukul Saikia v. State of Assam
Nagar Mahapalika v. Vinod Kumar Srivastava
Neelima Shangla v. State of Haryana
Rajasthan Public Service Commission and Another Vs. Harish Kumar Purohit and Others
Secy., Jaipur Development Authority v. Daulat Mal Jain
Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India
Simanchal Panda v. State of Orissa
State of Bihar v. Mohd. Kalimuddin
State of Bihar v. Secretariat Asstt. Successful Examinees' Union 1986
State of Haryana v. Ram Kumar Mann
State of Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwaha
State of Orissa v. Bhikari Charan Khuntia
State of Orissa v. Rajkishore Nanda
State of Punjab v. Dr. Rajeev Sarwal
State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra
State of U.P. v. Rajkumar Sharma
State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup Saroj
Subha B. Nair v. State of Kerala
Sushma Suri v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Syndicate Bank v. Shankar Paul
Tej Prakash Pathak v. Rajasthan High Court
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar and Ors.
Union of India v. International Trading Co.
Union of India v. Kali Dass Batish
Union Territory of Chandigarh v. Dilbagh Singh
Veerendra Kumar Gautam v. Karuna Nidhan Upadhyay
Vice-Chancellor, University of Allahabad v. Dr. Anand Prakash Mishra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.