SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1834

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SANGEETA K. VISHEN, MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Dhanjibhai Kanjibhai – Appellant
Versus
Special Land Acquisition Officer And Deputy Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Himanshu J. Amin, Ms Archana U. Amin.
For the Respondents: Government Pleader, Mr. Varun K. Patel.

ORDER :

SANGEETA K. VISHEN, J.

Mr Kanubhai M. Patel, learned Senior Advocate with Mr Varun K. Patel and Mr Vatsal Patel, learned advocates states that the record & proceedings are not yet received. Ms Archana U. Amin, learned advocate states that in the matters, wherein the instructions have been received, vakalatnama is already filed and in some of the matters, vakalatnama is not filed. It is stated that instructions shall be taken and needful shall be done in those matters. Joint request is made for some time.

At their request, list the matters on 25.10.2025. 

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top