IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, P. M. RAVAL, JJ.
Sunil @ Rahul Rajeshbhai Makwana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL (AGAINST CONVICTION) NO. 735 of 2017 With R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 895 of 2017
Decided on : 18-09-2025
JUDGMENT :
P. M. RAVAL, J.
1. Criminal Appeal No. 735 of 2017 is preferred by the Sunil @ Rahul Rajeshbhai Makwana i.e., Org. Accused No. 1 who has been convicted in Sessions Case No. 364 of 2013 vide judgment and order dated 24.04.2017 passed by the Ld. 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat. Whereas, Criminal Appeal No. 895 of 2017 is preferred by the State of Gujarat against the acquittal of Kirit @ Lalu Sumanbhai Rathod and Deepak Kanubhai Solanki i.e., Org. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 respectively in Sessions Case No. 364 of 2013 vide judgment and order dated 24.04.2017 passed by the Ld. 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat. The Org. Accused namely Sunil @ Rahul Rajeshbhai Makwana has been convicted under the provisions of Section 302 of IPC and sentenced for life imprisonment and is imposed with fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default thereof, one month SI. Since both the Appeals arise from the same Session Case, they are decided together.
2. The facts of the captioned Appeals as can be ascertained from the FIR reveal that:-
2.1 On 27.05.2013, Chandrakant Narayan Pawar (PW-7A) lodged a complaint at Khatodara Police Station, Surat, stating that on 26.05.2013, his son Rupesh Pawar had gone out to play cricket and returned home around 1:30–2:00 PM. After lunch, Rupesh again went out and returned around 7:00–7:30 PM. He later left for Piplod on his motorcycle (GJ 05 GB 2215). Around 10:45 PM, accused No.1, along with accused Nos. 2, 3, and a juvenile, arrived at the complainant’s residence on a two-wheeler. All were known to the complainant as they regularly gathered near his house. Accused No.1, holding a wooden log, stated that Rupesh had beaten him and he wanted to “finish” him. The co-accused also threatened the same. Not finding Rupesh at home, they left. The complainant informed Rupesh over phone, and Rupesh said he was on his way home. Around 11:15 PM, the complainant saw the accused near Choryasi Dairy, where Accused No.1 assaulted Rupesh on the head with a wooden log, while others attacked him with fists. On seeing the complainant, they fled. Rupesh was taken to Amruta Hospital and then Mahavir Trauma Hospital, where he was declared dead. FIR was registered under Sections 323, 302, 188, and 114 IPC.
2.2 After Investigation, the cahrgesheet came to be filed before the concerned Ld. Magistrate, and the case was committed to the Sessions Court, Surat as the case was sessions triable and the same was registered as Sessions Case No. 364/2013. Thereafter charges were framed vide Exh. 9 and the accused denied the charged and prayed for trial.
2.3 The Prosecution has examined the following witnesses to prove the guilt of the accused.
| PW No. | Name | State of Witness | Exh. |
| 1 | Rajubhai Jaynath Dave | Panch of inquest Panchnama | 19 |
| 2 | Vishalbhai Mukeshbhai Maisuri | Panch of scene of offence | 21 |
| 3 | Shashikantbhai Shantilal Patel | Panch of Discovery Panchnama | 30 |
| 4 | Piyushsinh Ajitsinh Raowlji | Eye witness | 33 |
| 5 | Pujaben Rajendrabhai Dubey | Eye witness | 38 |
| 6 | Sarikaben Jagannath Patil | Eye witness | 39 |
| 7 | Bhartiben Chandrakant Pawar | Mother of deceased and an eye witness | 51 |
| 7/A | Chandrakant Narayan Pawar | Complainant and an Eye witness | 57 |
| 8 | Dr. Rajdeep Surendra | RMO Mahavir Hospital | 58/A |
| 9 | Dr Chandresh Tailor | Doctor who conducted Post Mortem of deceased | 61 |
| 10 | Bhartiben Mahendrabhai Sadhu | Police witness who registered offence. | 67 |
| 11 | Bharatbhai G Damor | IO | 71 |
| 12 | Chandrakant Keshavlal Patel | IO and officer who filled chargesheet. | 75 |
2.4 Apart from leading oral evidence as mentioned above, prosecution to bring home the charge has relied upon the following documentary evidences:-
| Sr No. | Particulars | Exh. No |
| 1 | Inquest Panchnama | 20 |
| 2 | Panchnama of Scene of Offence. | 22 |
| 3 | Panchnama of Clothes of deceased after completion of post mortem | 27 |
| 4 | Panchnama of Physical condition of the accused. | 28 |
| 5 | Seizure panchnama of “pleasure” model motorcycle used in crime. | 31 |
| 6 | Complaint | 58 |
| 7 | Certificate issued by Dr. Piyush Khanna of Mahavir Hospital, Surat as regards primary treatment given to Rupesh Pawar. | 59 |
| 8 | PM Note | 63 |
| 9 | Cause of death Certificate | 64 |
| 10 | Report to register offence and Suchi | |
Intention to kill is essential for murder conviction; knowledge of likely death suffices for culpable homicide, requiring assessment of overall circumstances and violence nature.
The court ruled that the actions of the appellants amounted to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, reducing their conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 Part II IPC due to lack of intent.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on intention and circumstances, with the court applying Exception-4 of Section 300 IPC in cases of sudden quarrel.
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Rinkesh Goyal For the Respondent : Ajeet Singh Bhadoriya, Rajeev Upadhyay
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'culpable homicide amounting to murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Section 304 of the Indian Pen....
The main legal point established in the given judgment is that the appellant's act was committed on the spur of the moment, without premeditation, and without taking undue advantage or acting in a cr....
The court affirmed the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, highlighting that the accused acted with sufficient intent, despite claims of provocation, based on consistent eyewitness testimoni....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.