Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Bharwad Vashrambhai Samanbhai – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat through the Special Secretary, Revenue Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“12A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition.
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction by quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 09/02/2016 Passed by the Respondent No.1 in Revision Application No.MVV/GHARKHED/SNR/7/2012 preferred by the present petitioner against order dated 21/02/2012 passed by the Respondent No.2 the District Collector, Surendranagar in GHARKHED ORDI. APPEAL CASE NO. 03/2011-12.
(C) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the execution, operation and implementation of the order dated 09/02/2016 at annexure A passed by Respondent No. 1 in Revision Application No. MVV/GHARKHED/SNR/7/2012 preferred by the present petitioner against order dated 21/02/2012 passed by the Respondent No.2 the District Collector, Surendranagar in GHARKHED ORDI. APPEAL CASE ΝΟ. 03/2011-12.
(D) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition Your Lordships may be pleased to i
Revisionary powers must be exercised within a reasonable timeframe; actions taken after significant delays are deemed unjustifiable, preserving the validity of transactions during that period.
Authority must exercise revisional powers within a reasonable time to ensure legal rights are not unjustly compromised.
Revisional powers in land disputes must be exercised within a reasonable time; otherwise, established agricultural rights cannot be annulled.
The court ruled that summary eviction proceedings under the Saurashtra Gharkhed Ordinance must be initiated within a reasonable time, and transactions deemed invalid under Section 54 remain valid unt....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that actions under the Gharkhed Ordinance must be initiated within a reasonable time, and the concept of reasonable time is crucial in determini....
The delay of 11 years in exercising suo motu powers renders such actions arbitrary, violating established legal rights under registered sale deeds.
Suo motu revisional powers must be exercised within a reasonable period; delays result in the action being considered arbitrary and may infringe on established rights.
The power to initiate proceedings under Section 9 of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is subject to the principles of natural justice and the requirement....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
