SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2091

SUNITA AGARWAL, PRANAV TRIVEDI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Hussainbhai Satarbhai Meman – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MS MANISHA LAVKUMAR, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL with MR KM ANTANI, MR SIDDHARTH RAMI, MS HETAL G. PATEL, MR KRUTIK PARIKH and MR JAY TRIVEDI, AGPs
For the Respondent:MR SHALIN MEHTA, SR. ADVOCATE, assisted by MS ADITI RAOL, MR ANSHIN DESAI, SR. ADVOCATE assisted by MR ZALAK PIPALIA, MR. MEHUL S. SHAH, SR. ADVOCATE assisted by MR. VISHAL C. MEHTA, MS MEGHA JANI with MR MIT THAKKAR, MR ARJUN JOSHI, MS.KRISHA BHIMANI and MS ADITI SHETH, MR J.V. VAGHELA, MR UDIT D. MEHTA, MR HITESH N. ACHARYA, MR AMAR D MITHANI, MR. MANAN K. PANERI, MR VIRAL K SHAH, MR. RAJ A TRIVEDI, MR J.A. ADESHRA, MR PREMAL R JOSHI, MR HRIDAY BUCH, MR TULSHI R. SAVANI, MR. BRIJESH TRIVEDI, MR RUTVIJ S. OZA, MS SONAL D. VYAS, MR YN RAVANI, MR ARPIT P PATEL, MR RAJESH O GIDIYA, MR. ZUBIN F. BHARDA, MR BM MANGUKIYA, MS BELA A. PRAJAPATI, MR AR MAJMUDAR, MR VM TRIVEDI and MR SATYAM CHHAYA

JUDGMENT :

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)

1. The Civil Applications filed by the applicants for condonation of delay in preferring the respective Letters Patent Appeals are condoned as the delay is explained to the satisfaction of the Court. The delay condonation applications are accordingly allowed. The office shall allot regular number to the concerned appeals.

2. In the present group of appeals, the common question that has arisen for consideration is about the validity of the proceedings under Section 75 of the Saurashtra Gharkhed, Tenancy Settlement and Agriculture Lands Ordinance, 1949 (in short the "Ordinance' 1949") initiated by the Collector for alleged breach of Section 54 of the Ordinance' 1949 against the petitioners at different points of time.

3. The original Writ petitions were filed in the year 2013 onward and most of the Writ petitions, in the bunch, are of the year 2019, which have been filed after dismissal of the revision filed by the petitioners before the Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department (SSRD) thereby confirming the order passed by the Collector. The original order of eviction was passed by the Collector invoking t

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top