SUNITA AGARWAL, PRANAV TRIVEDI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Hussainbhai Satarbhai Meman – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. The Civil Applications filed by the applicants for condonation of delay in preferring the respective Letters Patent Appeals are condoned as the delay is explained to the satisfaction of the Court. The delay condonation applications are accordingly allowed. The office shall allot regular number to the concerned appeals.
2. In the present group of appeals, the common question that has arisen for consideration is about the validity of the proceedings under Section 75 of the Saurashtra Gharkhed, Tenancy Settlement and Agriculture Lands Ordinance, 1949 (in short the "Ordinance' 1949") initiated by the Collector for alleged breach of Section 54 of the Ordinance' 1949 against the petitioners at different points of time.
3. The original Writ petitions were filed in the year 2013 onward and most of the Writ petitions, in the bunch, are of the year 2019, which have been filed after dismissal of the revision filed by the petitioners before the Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department (SSRD) thereby confirming the order passed by the Collector. The original order of eviction was passed by the Collector invoking t
Bhanji Devshibhai Luhar vs. State of Gujarat
Bharati Reddy vs. State of Karnataka
Chandulal Gordhandas Ranodariya vs. State of Gujarat
Delhi Development Authority v. Ram Prakash
Delhi Development Authority vs. Sukhbir Singh & Ors.
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. C.C. Santhakumar
Gheru Lal Parekh v. Mahadeo Das
Gulabbhai Ravjibhai Patel vs. Badriprasad Vithalrao Bende
Jadav Prabhatbhai Jethabhai vs. Parmar Karsanbhai Dhulabhai
Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District and Anr. vs. D. Narsing Rao & Ors.
Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District, State of Rajasthan vs. D.R. Laxmi
Krishna Devi Malchand Kamathia & Ors. vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors.
Labhubhai Valjibhai Gajera vs. Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, Gujarat State
Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Escorts Ltd. and Ors.
M. Meenakshi vs. Metadin Agarwal (D) by Lrs.
Madhya Pradesh Housing Board vs. Shiv Shankar Mandil & Ors.
Mannanlal Khetan & Ors. vs. Kedar Nath Khetan
Medley Pharmaceuticals Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Daman
Mohamad Kavi Kohamad Amin vs. Fatmabai Ibrahim
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Swaran Singh
Pankaj Mehra vs. State of Maharashtra
Pune Municipal Corporation vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ram Karan (Dead) Through Lrs. vs. State of Rajasthan
Ram Kishun & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Rameshbhai Ambalal Shah vs. State of Gujarat
S.B. Gurbaksh Singh v. Union of India
Santoshkumar Shivgonda Patil vs. Balasaheb Tukaram Shevale
Shanker Raju vs. Union of India
Shiv Kumar & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors.
State of Gujarat vs. Amrutlal Hansrajbhai
State of Gujarat vs. Patel Raghav Natha
State of Kerala vs. Kunhikannan Nambiar Manjeri Manikoth, Naduvil
State of Maharashtra vs. Rattanlal
State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Gurdev Singh
State of Punjab vs. Bhatinda District Coop. Milk P. Union Ltd.
Sulochana Chandrakant Galande v. Pune Municipal Transport
Telangana Housing Board vs. Azamunnisa Begum (Died) Through Legal Representatives & Ors.
The court ruled that summary eviction proceedings under the Saurashtra Gharkhed Ordinance must be initiated within a reasonable time, and transactions deemed invalid under Section 54 remain valid unt....
Revisionary powers must be exercised within a reasonable timeframe; actions taken after significant delays are deemed unjustifiable, preserving the validity of transactions during that period.
Revisional powers in land disputes must be exercised within a reasonable time; otherwise, established agricultural rights cannot be annulled.
Authority must exercise revisional powers within a reasonable time to ensure legal rights are not unjustly compromised.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that actions under the Gharkhed Ordinance must be initiated within a reasonable time, and the concept of reasonable time is crucial in determini....
The delay of 11 years in exercising suo motu powers renders such actions arbitrary, violating established legal rights under registered sale deeds.
The power to initiate proceedings under Section 9 of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is subject to the principles of natural justice and the requirement....
Agriculturists from other states are recognized under Gujarat Tenancy Act; delay beyond reasonable period for revising agriculturist status renders proceedings void.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.