SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Ujjal Bhuyan & Indira Shah, JJ.
Sajid Hussain (Md.) & Others – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
Crl. Appeal Nos. 17, 47, 48, 50, 54, 57, 67, 71 of 2014
Decided On : 12-08-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. K. Agarwal, Mr. R.J. Baruah, Ms. N.A. Chandak, Mr. W. Sharma, Mr. B. Brahma, Mr. B. Das, Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, Mr. A. Ahmed, Mr. A. Matin, Mr. B.M. Choudhury, Mr. M. Khataniar, Ms. K.M. Talukdar, Mr. A.M. Bora, Mr. D. Gogoi, Mr. A.K. Bhattarcharya, Mr. A.K. Choudhury, Mr. D.K. Bhattarcharya, Mr. A.M. Bujarbaruah, Mr. M. Bhuyan, Mr. S.K. Talukdar, Mr. A. Ganguly and Mr. S. Khan.
For the Respondents: Ms. S. Jahan and Mr. D. Talukdar.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 147/148/323/448/302, 149, 324, 299, 300, 141, 325, 326 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 164, 313, 154, 157, 161, 149 and 162 - Offence of murder – Appeal against conviction – Examination of accused - Appeals have been filed against judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, in Sessions Case convicting the appellants under Sections 147/148/323/448/302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life with fine of for conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section - offence under Section 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC; RI for 3 months for the offence under Section 147 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and RI for 6 months with fine of Rs. further RI for 1 month for the offence – Court have heard learned Senior counsel for appellants in Criminal Appeal No. learned Senior counsel for appellants in Criminal Appeal - Criminal Appeal - Learned counsel for appellant in Criminal Appeal learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal – Held, Court have heard Mr. A.K. learned Senior counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 54/2014, learned Senior counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal - Criminal Appeal No. learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal - Court had rightly convicted them as their presence in the place of occurrence when the offence took place was not only consistently mentioned throughout the evidence but also definite overt acts were attributed to each one of them - Convict the remaining 6 accused appellants and 6. Md. as they were only generally mentioned without attributing any overt act to them. In so far is concerned, his case has already been dealt with in paragraph 55 of the judgment - Even when Section 149 IPC is applied, some reasonable circumstance should be discernible to justify conviction - Convict those accused persons whose presence was not only consistently mentioned throughout the evidence but also to whom some overt acts were attributed - Appeals are disposed

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

1. This bunch of criminal appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonitpur at Tezpur in Sessions Case No. 04/2005 convicting the appellants under Sections 147/148/323/448/302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life with fine of Rs. 10,000 each for conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC; RI for 3 years for conviction under Section 448 IPC read with Section 149 IPC; RI for 6 months for the offence under Section 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC; RI for 3 months for the offence under Section 147 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and RI for 6 months with fine of Rs. 500/- and in default, further RI for 1 month for the offence under Section 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC.

2. We have heard Mr. A.K. Bhattacharjee, learned Senior counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 54/2014, Mr. Kamal Agarwal, learned Senior counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 47 and 48/2014, Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 17/2014, Mr. A.M. Bujarbaruah, learned Senior counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 57/2014, Mr. B.M. Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 67/2014, Mr. A.M. Bora, learned counsel for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 50/2014 and Mr. A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 71/2014. We have also heard Ms. S. Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent, State of Assam.

3. Prosecution case in brief is that on 05.03.2003 at about 8.45 pm, PW1 Md. Afruj Hussain arrived at the Tezpur Police Station compound in a TATA Sumo vehicle bringing with him his brother Md. Ejaj Hussain @ Bittu in a blood smeared condition. PW1 verbally informed the police that on that day, i.e. on 05.03.2003 at about 8.10 pm, while he was in Himalayan Holidays' counter, some miscreants armed with sharp weapons grievously injured his brother Md. Ejaj Hussain by stabbing and hacking him on his head and abdomen. Finding the condition of the injured to be very serious, injured was sent to Kanaklata Civil Hospital by the said TATA Sumo itself. Emergency Officer of the Police Station SI Nagen Saikia was directed to make necessary medical requisition for treatment of the injured and also to take necessary steps as per law. The above information was duly received where after General Diary Entry was made to that effect, being GD Entry (GDE) No. 247 (Exhibit-15).

4. When the injured reached the hospital, attending doctors declared him dead.

5. Inquest on the dead body of Ejaj Hussain was carried out at the Civil Hospital itself where after inquest report was prepared (Ext.1).

6. At around 11.45 pm of 05.03.2003, written Ejahar was lodged by PW1. In this Ejahar, informant stated that on 05.03.2003 at about 8 o' clock, while his brother (Ejaj) was sitting at the TATA Sumo counter of Himalayan Holidays situated at Kabarkhana Road, the accused persons named therein well-equipped with dao, stick, sharp pointed weapon, rod, etc, came in a group, took away his brother from the counter and caused grievous injuries on his head and abdomen by attacking him with dao and sharp pointed weapon. As a result of such attack, his brother Ejaj died on the spot. Seeing his brother dying, PW1 along with his elder brother Jamal (PW2) went to save him but they too were assaulted by the accused persons with dao and stick. The following persons were named as accused in the written Ejahar:-

1. Md. Abdul Latif

2. Md. Suleman

3. Md. Abdul Rahman

4. Md. Abdul Kasem

5. Ajmail Gaji

6. Ramjan Ali

7. Ilias Ali

8. Md. Wasim Miraj Choudhury @ Chitto

9. Md. Mafijul

10. Sazid Hussain

11. Md. Halim

12. Osman Goni

13. Naim Gaji

14. Munna Choudhury

15. Asad Ahmed Gaji and many others.

7. On the basis of the same, Tezpur Police Station Case No. 160/2003 under Sections 147/148/149/44











































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top