Back
NANI TAGIA
Hibu Tama – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer process and its basis. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenges against transfer orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. equitable treatment in transfer recommendations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. petitioner's status compared to respondent no. 2. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. legal standards for employee transfer. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. importance of adhering to administrative guidelines. (Para 30 , 31 , 34) |
| 7. hierarchy and personnel suitability in transfer decisions. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. court's decision to quash the transfer order. (Para 64 , 65) |
JUDGMENT
Nani Tagia, J. - The Court proceedings have been conducted by means of creating a Virtual Court with the help of technology, so as to maintain distance between the Advocates, the Staffs and the presiding Judge.
Heard Mr. K. Tama, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Ete, learned Senior Additional Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh assisted by Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel for the Rural Works Department representing respondent No. 1 and Mr. T. T. Tara, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 29.06.2020 issued by th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
