SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Gau) 238

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Mira Rani Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Singha, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manish Choudhury, J. - The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the writ petitioner for setting aside and quashing of a letter dated 17.11.2018 issued by the respondent no. 5 i.e. the Chief Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited whereby the application of the petitioner offered for distributorship of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) for the subject location, Borokalia Sharsho, District - South Salmara - Mankachar, Assam was rejected and for a direction to the respondent authorities in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited to accept the application of the writ petitioner for the afore-mentioned subject location.

2. The genesis behind the writ petition is an advertisement published jointly by three Public Sector Oil Marketing companies viz. Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) for selection of distributors of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in 93 locations in different districts of the State of Assam.

3. By the said advertisement published in the daily newspaper, "Asomiya Pratidin", in its issue dated 25.05.2018, the Public Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top