SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 840

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Mainajan Khatun W/o Nurul Isslam Beg - Appellant
Versus
The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd And 4 Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) 189 of 2019
Decided on : 14-11-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
MD. A MATLIB Advocate for MR. S.S. ROY

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1949 – Article 226 – Registration Act, 1908 – Section 17, 49 – Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – Section 105 – Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – Effect of non-registration of documents required to be registered – Lease defined – Learned Senior Counsel assisted learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent – Court have also learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent – Held, Petitioner only gave a notarized Deed which was not acceptable terms and conditions mentioned in the Brochure – Rejection of candidature of petitioner under no circumstances can be said to be an action by respondent authority to be vitiated by malaise or perversity or unreasonableness or irrationality – Court dismisses writ petition – Dismissal of writ petition interim stands vacated – Respondent authorities are given liberty to proceed with the said distributorship in accordance with law – Petition stands dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. B. D. Konwar, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. D. Brahma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. Borthakur, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. I have also heard Mr. N. H. Barbhuiya the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5.

2. This Court vide an order dated 11.01.2019 had issued notice returnable by 8 (eight) weeks and had stayed the cancellation letter dated 23.10.2018 and any consequential allotment of LPG distributorship at Chikni in the district of Barpeta to respondent No.5. The respondent No.5 being affected with the said order dated 11.01.2019 which has been extended from time to time had filed an Interlocutory Application being I.A.(Civil) No.783/2022 seeking vacation/modification/alteration of the order dated 11.01.2019 passed in the accompanying writ petition. The said Interlocutory Application came up for consideration before this Court today.

3. While hearing the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties in the said Interlocutory Application, it transpires that any decision on the said Interlocutory Application would have a bearing on the merits of the case. Accordingly, with the consent of all the parties, the matter has been taken up for final disposal at this stage.

4. For appreciation of facts involved in the instant writ petition it would be relevant to take note of that a notice for appointment of distributors of LPG at 93 locations including a location at Serial No.18 pertaining to the respondent No.1 company situated at place Chikni, Gram Panchayat Chikni, Block Ruposhi in the District of Barpeta was published in a news daily. The allotment of the distributorship was to be made in respect a Class Open (Women) insofar as the location at Serial No.18. It was further mentioned in respect to Serial No.18 that the class of the market would be rural and the security deposit would be Rs.4,00,000/- and the marketing plan was 2018-2019.

5. At this stage, it may be relevant to take note of that in the said notice for appointment of LPG distributorship advertisement, a detail translated copy of which was enclosed to the affidavit filed by the respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 would show that the detail guidelines on eligibility criteria for selection of LPG distributor, infrastructure requirements of land for LPG godown, land for showroom/ready built showroom, infrastructure for home delivery of cylinders etc. along with the details of selection process were given in the Brochure for selection of LPG distributorship which can be downloaded from any of the Oil Companies’ websites-www.iocl.com, www.ebharatgas.com, www.bharatpetroleum.in, www.hindustanpetroleum.com of IOCL, BPCL and HPCL. Though the petitioner did not enclose the Brochure to the writ petition which ought to have been done, the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 have included the same as Annexure-2 to the affidavit in opposition.

6. For the purpose of instant writ petition, Clause 1(w) is relevant taking into account the land which is required to be offered for obtaining the distributorship. Clause 1(w) being relevant is reproduced hereinbelow.

    “1.(w). ‘Ownership’ or ‘Own’ for godown/showroom for Sheheri Vitrak, Rurban Vitrak, Gramin Vitrak and Durgam Kshetriya Vitrak Type of Distributorship means having:

a. Ownership title of the property

Or

b. Registered lease deed having minimum 15 years of valid lease period commencing on any day from the date of advertisement up to the last date of submission of application as specified either in the advertisement or corrigendum (if any).

Additionally, applicants having registered lease deed commencing on any date prior to the date of advertisement will also be considered provided the lease is valid for a minimum period of 15 years from the date of advertisement. The applicant should have ownership as defined under the term ‘Own’ above in the name of applicant/member of “Family Unit” (as defined in multiple dea

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top