IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Mainajan Khatun W/o Nurul Isslam Beg – Appellant
Versus
The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd And 4 Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 189 of 2019
Decided on : 14-11-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, 14 - Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 105 - Registration Act, 1908 - Section 17(1)(d), 49 - Tender - Alteration of Order - Seeking vacation/ modification/alteration of order passed in accompanying writ petition – Petitioner on last date of submission of bid did not have any title document or a registered Lease Deed for a period of 15 years. Para 15
Finding of the Court :
Petitioner having submitted her bid documents, it was requirement as per tender condition that as on that day, petitioner was required to have a title over land offered or had a registered lease deed for a minimum period of 15 years as on date of submission of tender/bid - Admittedly, Petitioner only gave a notarized Deed which was not acceptable in view of terms and conditions mentioned in Brochure - Rejection of candidature of petitioner under no circumstances can be said to be an action by respondent authority to be vitiated by malafide or perversity or unreasonableness or irrationality insistence of Respondent Authority to requirement of a title document or for a registered Deed of Lease for 15 years from date of submission of bid document cannot also be faulted upon - Further allowing petitioner to submit a registered lease deed after last date of submission of bid would be deviating from terms of Brochure and would result in violating mandate of Article 14 of Constitution - Under such circumstances, rejection of candidature of petitioner was rightly done by Respondent Authorities for which there arises no question of interference.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. B. D. Konwar, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. D. Brahma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. Borthakur, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. I have also heard Mr. N. H. Barbhuiya the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5.
2. This Court vide an order dated 11.01.2019 had issued notice returnable by 8 (eight) weeks and had stayed the cancellation letter dated 23.10.2018 and any consequential allotment of LPG distributorship at Chikni in the district of Barpeta to respondent No.5. The respondent No.5 being affected with the said order dated 11.01.2019 which has been extended from time to time had filed an Interlocutory Application being I.A.(Civil) No.783/2022 seeking vacation/modification/alteration of the order dated 11.01.2019 passed in the accompanying writ petition. The said Interlocutory Application came up for consideration before this Court today.
3. While hearing the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties in the said Interlocutory Application, it transpires that any decision on the said Interlocutory Application would have a bearing on the merits of the case. Accordingly, with the consent of all the parties, the matter has been taken up for final disposal at this stage.
4. For appreciation of facts involved in the instant writ petition it would be relevant to take note of that a notice for appointment of distributors of LPG at 93 locations including a location at Serial No.18 pertaining to the respondent No.1 company situated at place Chikni, Gram Panchayat Chikni, Block Ruposhi in the District of Barpeta was published in a news daily. The allotment of the distributorship was to be made in respect a Class Open (Women) insofar as the location at Serial No.18. It was further mentioned in respect to Serial No.18 that the class of the market would be rural and the security deposit would be Rs.4,00,000/- and the marketing plan was 2018-2019.
5. At this stage, it may be relevant to take note of that in the said notice for appointment of LPG distributorship advertisement, a detail translated copy of which was enclosed to the affidavit filed by the respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 would show that the detail guidelines on eligibility criteria for selection of LPG distributor, insfrastructure requirements of land for LPG godown, land for showroom/ready built showroom, infrastructure for home delivery of cylinders etc. along with the details of selection process were given in the Brochure for selection of LPG distributorship which can be downloaded from any of the Oil Companies’ websites–www.iocl.com, www.ebharatgas.com, www.bharatpetroleum.in, www.hindustanpetroleum.com of IOCL, BPCL and HPCL. Though the petitioner did not enclose the Brochure to the writ petition which ought to have been done, the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 have included the same as Annexure-2 to the affidavit in opposition.
6. For the purpose of instant writ petition, Clause 1(w) is relevant taking into account the land which is required to be offered for obtaining the distributorship. Clause 1(w) being relevant is reproduced hereinbelow.
a. Ownership title of the property
Or
b. Registered lease deed having minimum 15 years of valid lease period commencing on any day from the date of advertisement up to the last date of submission of application as specified either in the advertisement or corrigendum (if any).
Additionally, applicants having registered lease deed commencing on any date prior to the date of advertisement will also be considered provided the lease is valid for a minimum period of 15 years from the date of advertisement. The applicant should have ownership as defined under the term ‘Own’ above in the name of applicant/member of “Family Unit” (as defined in multiple de
Section 105 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 read with Section 17(1)(d) and Section 49 of Registration Act, 1908 which specifically mandates that a lease deed for a period exceeding one year is comp....
The applicant must fulfill the eligibility criteria at the time of application, and decisions regarding forfeiture must be justified and not arbitrary.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of meeting the eligibility criteria, particularly the requirement of ownership or registered lease deed for the plot of land offer....
Adherence to specified eligibility criteria, particularly the requirement of a registered lease deed for the plot of land offered for LPG distributorship, is crucial for consideration of candidature.
The court established that compliance with specific eligibility criteria, including land ownership and dimensions, is essential for the approval of LPG distributorship applications, and that subseque....
The court emphasized the importance of verifying the eligibility of a candidate on the last date of the application and upheld the IOCL's discretion to accept alternative land due to the long delay i....
The court established that while power of attorney registration is not mandatory, compliance with eligibility criteria regarding lease deed registration is essential for distributorship.
Documents submitted for LPG distributorship must meet ownership requirements as defined in the Brochure; notarized lease deeds do not suffice under the Registration Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.