IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA, J.
M/s. Barua And Company Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. – Appellants
VERSUS
The State Of Assam And Ors – Respondents
WP(C)/2461 of 2020
Decided on : 02-11-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 299 - National Sports Club of Assam (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1977 - Section 4 - Nehru Stadium Sports Complex in heart of city was accommodated with a guest house named Radha Gobinda Baruah Guest House (RGBGH) which was run by Board of Sports, respondent No. 2 - Said Board of Sports, Assam was formed under National Sports Club of Assam (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1977 and as per Section 4 of said Act, 1977, Board was vested with all properties, movable or immovable, and all rights, powers and privileges of said Club which immediately before commencement of this Act belonged to Club or any other committee or persons and, for purpose of such management and control, vest in Board - In year, Board was in a precarious financial condition and physical condition of guest house was even worse - Accrued debts of Board on account of guest house was about Rs. 1.26 crores including PF and ESI dues of its employees and in that backdrop, a decision was taken to lease out guest house to a private party through a process of tender, to convert and run same as a hotel.
Finding of the Court:
It would not be proper to make any observation which affects merit of case of both parties to writ petition left out to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal - Further it is clarified that Tribunal or any Civil Court is not bound by any of the observations made in this order while adjudicating the issues between the parties to this writ petition before it - I dispose of this writ petition thereby directing the petitioners to approach Arbitral Forum within a period of 60 (sixty) days from today and till then the respondents shall not initiate any steps for disturbing the possession of the petitioners over the leased out premises without due process of law. Thereafter the Arbitral Forum shall have the jurisdiction to pass any interim order. For the said purpose the petitioners may take steps for constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal afresh in consultation with the respondents or otherwise the petitioners may appoint its Arbitrator in response to the notice issued by the respondents which was duly received by the petitioners. No Costs. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
Result: Petition disposed of
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. N. Deka, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, the learned Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. P. Baruah, the learned counsel for the respondent State representing the respondent No. 1 and Mr. D. Baruah, the learned Additional Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. N. Upadhayay, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. The Nehru Stadium Sports Complex in the heart of the city of Guwahati was accommodated with a guest house named Radha Gobinda Baruah Guest House (RGBGH) which was run by the Board of Sports, Assam, the respondent No. 2. The said Board of Sports, Assam was formed under the National Sports Club of Assam (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1977 and as per Section 4 of the said Act, 1977, the Board was vested with all properties, movable or immovable, and all rights, powers and privileges of the said Club which immediately before commencement of this Act belonged to the Club or any other committee or persons and, for the purpose of such management and control, vest in the Board. In the year, 2000, the Board was in a precarious financial condition and the physical condition of the guest house was even worse. The accrued debts of the Board on account of the guest house was about Rs. 1.26 crores including PF and ESI dues of its employees and in that backdrop, a decision was taken to lease out the guest house to a private party through a process of tender, to convert and run the same as a hotel. With the said intent, an advertisement in newspaper was issued by the respondent No. 2. In pursuance of the said advertisement in the newspaper, 5 (five) numbers of private parties came forward to take the Radha Gobinda Baruah Guest House (RGBGH) on lease. For better appreciation the subsequent Cabinet Memorandum circulated under Rule 17 of the Assam Rules of Executive Business, 1968 is extracted herein below:-
(CIRCULATED UNDER RULE 17 OF THE ASSAM RULES OF EXECUTIVE BUSINESS)
File No. SYW. 204/98
Sub:- Lease of the Radha Govinda Barua Guest House in Nehru Stadium, Guwahati.
The Radha Govinda Barua Guest House in Nehru Stadium Guwahati is under the care and control of the Board of Sports of Assam. The RGBGH was one of the main sources of income of the BSA till some years ago. Because of the lack of proper administration and management the condition of the B.S.A. has gone from bad to worse. Failure of business accumulated the following debts:-
| 1. Unpaid salary for 12 months to the staff of the BSA | Rs.42.00 lakhs |
| 2. Irrecoverable loss for food/lodging- | Rs. 24.00 Lakhs |
| 3. Unpaid EPF/LIC/ESI etc and gratuity to retired employees- | Rs.10.00 Lakhs |
| 4. ASEB/GMC/PHE dues- | Rs. 50.00 Lakhs |
| Total | Rs. 126.00 Lakhs. |
The Board of Sports of Assam with a view to make the RGBGH to function fully and yield income to the BSA, after careful consideration decided to give the RGBGH on lease to private party periodically and initially for 20(twenty) years.
After advertisement in News paper, 5(five) nos of private parties come forward to take the RGBGH on lease. After scrutiny the core committee short listed 3 (three) groups. The 3 (three) parties were further reduced to 2 (two) on the basis of offers. These 2 (two) parties are:-
1. Uttam Narayan Sarma (UNS) offered for 30 years with Rs. 80,06,985.60. they agreed to take over the existing 37 nos permanent and 7 nos casual employees of the Guest House under the B.S.A.. They also agreed to make one time payment of Rs. 2.00 lakhs for the use of BAR License.
2. Barua & Co-Pvt. Ltd. (BCPL) (Landmark Ho
Bishandayal and Sons Vs. State of Orissa and Others reported in (2001) 1 SCC 555.
Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. Vs. SBI Home Finance Ltd. reported in (2011) 5 SCC 532
Commissioner of Police –VsGordhandas Bhanji reported in AIR 1951 SC 469
Ester Industries Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board and Others reported in (1996) 11 SCC 199
Joshi Technologies International INC Vs. Union of India and Others reported in (2015) 7 SCC 728
Kasinka Trading and Anr Vs. Union of India and Another reported in (1995) 1 SCC 274
Kanak(SMT)and another Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and Others reported in (2003) 7 SCC 693
M/s Jitram Shiv Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and others reported in (1981) 1 SCC 11
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Vs. State of U.P reported in (1979) 2 SCC 409
State of West Bengal Vs. B. K. Mandal and sons reported in AIR 1962 SC 779
State of Uttar Pradesh and Another Vs. Murari Lal and Brothers Ltd. reported in 1971(2) SCC 449
Shreejee Sales Corpn. Vs. Union of India reported in (1997) 3 SCC 398
Union of India – Vs- Tantia Construction (P) Ltd. reported in (2011) 5 SCC 697
Union of India Vs. Tantia Construction (P) Ltd reported in (2011) 5 SCC 697
Vidya Drolia and Ors Vs. Durga Trading Corporation reported in (2021) 2 SCC 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.