SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 173

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
AYAN KUMAR DAS AND ANR. - APPELLANT
Vs.
THE UNION OF INDAI AND 9 ORS. - RESPONDENT
WP(C) no. 3196 of 2021
Decided On : 06-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : MR D DEKA
For The Respondent: ASSTT.S.G.I.

Point of Law : Appointment of guardian - Article 226 of the Constitution empowers this Court to pass suitable orders on an application being filed to appoint a guardian or a next friend to an incompetent person like the petitioners' mother who is in persistent vegetative state.

Headnote:

Appointment of guarding - Whether in law and on facts the petitioner can be appointed as guardian of the mother of the petitioners who is in persistent vegetative state' and Coma – High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution can grant approval for withdrawal of life support to such incompetent person.

Finding of the Court:

Article 226 of the Constitution empowers this Court to pass suitable orders on an application being filed to appoint a guardian or a next friend to an incompetent person like the petitioners' mother who is in persistent vegetative state -patient lying in comatose state or in a vegetative state, the High Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, in absence of any appropriate legislation, can issue guidelines as temporary measures till the field is taken over by a proper legislation for appointment of guardian to a person lying in a comatose state or a vegetative state.

Result: Disposed of

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. R. Kaman, learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. P. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Mr. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 9; and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 3. I have also heard Ms. S. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the Assistant Commissioner, Kamrup(M), Assam and Mrs. R.S. Choudhury, learned counsel appointed by this Court as Amicus Curiae.

2. In the instant writ petition, the question that arises for consideration is as to whether in law and on facts the petitioner can be appointed as guardian of the mother of the petitioners who is in ‘persistent vegetative state’ and ‘coma’.

3. The brief facts of the instant case are that the petitioner No. 1 is the son and the petitioner No. 2 is the daughter of Smt. Madhumita Das. The said Madhumita Das herein after referred to as the mother of the petitioners was living in Naharlagun in Arunachal Pradesh and was found in an unconscious state in the morning of 18.12.2020. She was thereupon brought to Guwahati for treatment and was initially admitted to the Apollo Hospitals, Guwahati on 19.12.2020. Thereafter on 20.12.2020, she underwent emergency re-compressive Craneictomy with evacuation of SDH and ICH Surgery. On the basis of the said surgery, a part of the skull of the petitioners’ mother was removed. Post surgery, the mother of the petitioners was in ventilation support and in comatose state and vegetative state. On 13.01.2021 she was discharged from Apollo Hospitals, Guwahati.

4. Upon discharge, the mother of the petitioners was admitted in a Neurorehabilitation Centre named ‘Palon Rewalk’ on 13.01.2021. In the said Centre, she was being provided with care and support for regaining consciousness. Thereafter on 18.02.2021, the mother of the petitioners was discharged from ‘Palon Rewalk’ and on the same day she was admitted to the Downtown Hospitals and underwent surgery to attach the part of the skull that was removed in the surgery on 19.12.2020. On 08.03.2021, the mother of the petitioners was released from Down Town Hospital and since 08.03.2021 till the filing of the writ petition, the mother of the petitioners was at her home at Patharkuchi, Guwahati. It is the case of the petitioners that till the date of filing of the writ petition, the petitioners have already spent an amount of Rs. 22,00,000/-towards the treatment and care for their mother and thereby they have almost emptied all resources to secure finances for the treatment of their mother and at present they are borrowing from their friends and family to meet the expenses for daily treatment of their mother who is in vegetative state. The petitioners have filed an additional affidavit bringing on record the various movable and immovable properties of the mother of the petitioners the details of which are as herein under:

Movable Properties:

Sl. No.

Type of Asset

Details

1.

Jewellery

Jewellery in locker SBI Naharlagun

2.

Kisan Vikas Patra

40BC50632

3.

Kisan Vikas Patra

23CE549176

4.

Kisan Vikas Patra

86320087

5.

Kisan Vikas Patra

86320414

6.

National Savings Certificate

04EF84209-10

7.

National Savings Certificate

04EF841582-83

8.

National Savings Certificate

04EF844350

9.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992075

10.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992074

11.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992073

12.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992042

13.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992041

14.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992094

15.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992095

16.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992098

17.

National Savings Certificate

35EF992097

18.

National

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top