IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
AYAN KUMAR DAS AND ANR. - APPELLANT
Vs.
THE UNION OF INDAI AND 9 ORS. - RESPONDENT
WP(C) no. 3196 of 2021
Decided On : 06-04-2022
Appointment of guarding - Whether in law and on facts the petitioner can be appointed as guardian of the mother of the petitioners who is in persistent vegetative state' and Coma – High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution can grant approval for withdrawal of life support to such incompetent person.
Finding of the Court:
Article 226 of the Constitution empowers this Court to pass suitable orders on an application being filed to appoint a guardian or a next friend to an incompetent person like the petitioners' mother who is in persistent vegetative state -patient lying in comatose state or in a vegetative state, the High Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, in absence of any appropriate legislation, can issue guidelines as temporary measures till the field is taken over by a proper legislation for appointment of guardian to a person lying in a comatose state or a vegetative state.
Result: Disposed of
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. R. Kaman, learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. P. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Mr. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 9; and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 3. I have also heard Ms. S. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the Assistant Commissioner, Kamrup(M), Assam and Mrs. R.S. Choudhury, learned counsel appointed by this Court as Amicus Curiae.
2. In the instant writ petition, the question that arises for consideration is as to whether in law and on facts the petitioner can be appointed as guardian of the mother of the petitioners who is in ‘persistent vegetative state’ and ‘coma’.
3. The brief facts of the instant case are that the petitioner No. 1 is the son and the petitioner No. 2 is the daughter of Smt. Madhumita Das. The said Madhumita Das herein after referred to as the mother of the petitioners was living in Naharlagun in Arunachal Pradesh and was found in an unconscious state in the morning of 18.12.2020. She was thereupon brought to Guwahati for treatment and was initially admitted to the Apollo Hospitals, Guwahati on 19.12.2020. Thereafter on 20.12.2020, she underwent emergency re-compressive Craneictomy with evacuation of SDH and ICH Surgery. On the basis of the said surgery, a part of the skull of the petitioners’ mother was removed. Post surgery, the mother of the petitioners was in ventilation support and in comatose state and vegetative state. On 13.01.2021 she was discharged from Apollo Hospitals, Guwahati.
4. Upon discharge, the mother of the petitioners was admitted in a Neurorehabilitation Centre named ‘Palon Rewalk’ on 13.01.2021. In the said Centre, she was being provided with care and support for regaining consciousness. Thereafter on 18.02.2021, the mother of the petitioners was discharged from ‘Palon Rewalk’ and on the same day she was admitted to the Downtown Hospitals and underwent surgery to attach the part of the skull that was removed in the surgery on 19.12.2020. On 08.03.2021, the mother of the petitioners was released from Down Town Hospital and since 08.03.2021 till the filing of the writ petition, the mother of the petitioners was at her home at Patharkuchi, Guwahati. It is the case of the petitioners that till the date of filing of the writ petition, the petitioners have already spent an amount of Rs. 22,00,000/-towards the treatment and care for their mother and thereby they have almost emptied all resources to secure finances for the treatment of their mother and at present they are borrowing from their friends and family to meet the expenses for daily treatment of their mother who is in vegetative state. The petitioners have filed an additional affidavit bringing on record the various movable and immovable properties of the mother of the petitioners the details of which are as herein under:
Movable Properties:
| Sl. No. | Type of Asset | Details |
| 1. | Jewellery | Jewellery in locker SBI Naharlagun |
| 2. | Kisan Vikas Patra | 40BC50632 |
| 3. | Kisan Vikas Patra | 23CE549176 |
| 4. | Kisan Vikas Patra | 86320087 |
| 5. | Kisan Vikas Patra | 86320414 |
| 6. | National Savings Certificate | 04EF84209-10 |
| 7. | National Savings Certificate | 04EF841582-83 |
| 8. | National Savings Certificate | 04EF844350 |
| 9. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992075 |
| 10. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992074 |
| 11. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992073 |
| 12. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992042 |
| 13. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992041 |
| 14. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992094 |
| 15. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992095 |
| 16. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992098 |
| 17. | National Savings Certificate | 35EF992097 |
| 18. | National | |
Shobha Gopalakrishnan Vs. State of Kerela
Vandana Tyagi Vs. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
Dr. Madhu Vijaykumar Gupta Vs. State of Maharashtra
Rajni Hariom Sharma Vs. Union of India & Anr.
Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug Vs. Union of India reported in (2011) 4 SCC 454
SupremeToday
The court established that it can act as parens patriae to appoint a guardian for a comatose patient when no legislative provisions exist.
Point of law: It shall be the duty of the petitioner – guardian to meet the obligations/duties similar to those as described under Section 15 and to maintain and submit the accounts similar to those ....
The court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 to appoint a guardian for a comatose individual, highlighting the absence of specific legislation for such cases.
Point of Law : Transactions in respect of the movable and immovable properties of the patient, by the petitioner - guardian, shall be strictly in accordance with the provisions of law. If the petitio....
The judgment establishes the court's authority to invoke the parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint a guardian for a person in a comatose state in the absence of specific legislative provisions.
The court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint a guardian for an individual in a vegetative state due to inadequate legal provisions.
The court established that Article 226 of the Constitution can be used to appoint guardians for individuals in a comatose state when no statutory remedy exists, emphasizing the need for judicial inte....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.