NELSON SAILO
Laltluangpuia, S/o Laibuanga – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This order will dispose of all the 3 (three) writ petitions.
Heard Mr. Joseph Mangsuanhau, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC appearing for the respondent Union of India. Also heard Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State respondents.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for payment of compensation for their land, which was acquired by the respondents for construction/extension of road from Farkawn to Thekte Village in the year 2010. According to the petitioners, although some amount of compensation was given to them, but the same is insufficient and it was also not assessed in terms of the relevant law on land acquisition including the relevant Schedule of Rates (SOR) to be followed for assessing property damage as followed by the State Public Works Department.
3. A brief background in respect of the petitioners in WP(C) No. 140/2019 is that they initially approached this Court by filing WP(C) No. 98/2014, which however was dismissed vide Order dated 01.07.2015. The petitioners then preferred W.A. No. 1/2016, which came to be disposed of along with WP(C) No. 9/2018 filed by one Mr. Lalbuka
G.Jayashree & Ors vs Bhagwandas S.Patel & Ors. (2009) 3 SCC 141
Khub Chand & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors (2014) 3 SCC 183.
Tukaram Kana Joshi &Ors. Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.