SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 1003

MARLI VANKUNG
Shanti Kumar Chakma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. C. Lalfakzuala
For the Respondent: Ms Zairemsangpuii

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. C Lalfakzuala, learned counsel for the petitioners along Ms. Zairemsangpuii learned CGC for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5, Mr. P. Goswami, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 6 & 7, Mr. P.C. Lalthangmawia, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent Nos. 8 & 9 and Mr. Reuben Lalrinsanga, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 10, 11 & 12.

2. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of the appropriate writ against the respondents in the matter of land acquisition of Indo-Bangla Border Fencing (IBBF) from Chhotapansury to Jaralsury including diverted road under CADC area within Lawngtlai District, wherein the respondents have failed to make payment of compensation amounting to Rs. 31,99,91,282/-(Rupees thirty one crore ninety nine lakh ninety one thousand two hundred eighty two) only to the petitioners in respect of Award No. 1/2018. The writ petition is also for payment of solatium and interest as per the Road to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and interest as per Section 80 of the Act.

3. Brief facts of the case is that the petitioners are the le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top