SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 730

NELSON SAILO
Veduzo Sasu – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Zhimomi.

JUDGMENT :

Nelson Sailo, J.

1. The dispute involved in the present writ petition is with regard to the inter-se-seniority between the writ petitioners and the private respondents. According to the petitioners, they were directly appointed as Block Development Officers (BDO) through a selection process while the private respondents have been absorbed and regularized to the said post after they were either appointed on contract basis or brought on deputation from other Departments except for respondent No. 17, who was promoted from a lower post to the post of BDO.

2. Heard Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Taka Masa, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Arenlong, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 4 to 16. Also heard Mr. K Wotsa, learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. None appears for the respondent No. 17 despite notice.

3. Brief facts of the case essential for disposal of the writ petition may be noticed at the outset. Pursuant to the advertisement floated by the Nagaland Public Service Commission (NPSC) vide Addendum dated 12.07.2012 for 16 posts of BDO under the Rural Development Department which was res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top