NELSON SAILO
Veduzo Sasu – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nelson Sailo, J.
1. The dispute involved in the present writ petition is with regard to the inter-se-seniority between the writ petitioners and the private respondents. According to the petitioners, they were directly appointed as Block Development Officers (BDO) through a selection process while the private respondents have been absorbed and regularized to the said post after they were either appointed on contract basis or brought on deputation from other Departments except for respondent No. 17, who was promoted from a lower post to the post of BDO.
2. Heard Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Taka Masa, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Arenlong, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 4 to 16. Also heard Mr. K Wotsa, learned Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. None appears for the respondent No. 17 despite notice.
3. Brief facts of the case essential for disposal of the writ petition may be noticed at the outset. Pursuant to the advertisement floated by the Nagaland Public Service Commission (NPSC) vide Addendum dated 12.07.2012 for 16 posts of BDO under the Rural Development Department which was res
Bachhittar Singh vs. State of Punjab
Amarjeet Singh and Others vs. Devi Ratan and Others
Direct Recruitment Class-II Engg. Officers' Assn vs. State of Maharashtra
Ganga Vishan Gujarati and Others v. State of Rajasthan and Others
S. Sumnyam and Others vs. Limi Niri and Others
State of Bihar vs. Akhouri Sachindra Nath
State of Uttaranchal vs. Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.