SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO
Neilhoulie Seyie – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. C.T. Jamir, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners in WP(C)/62(K) of 2019 who are respondents Nos. 3 and 4 in the other writ petition, i.e., WP(C)/124 of 2019 and also heard Mr. R. Iralu, learned Senior counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in the former writ petition and the two petitioners in the later writ petition (one whom i.e., petitioner No. 1 is the respondent no. 9 in the former writ petition).
2. Vide a notification dated 19.11.2018, the tentative seniority list of inspectors in the Department of Food and Civil Supplies was circulated wherein the petitioners in WP(C)/62 of 2019 who are direct recruits to the post (through competitive exam conducted by the NPSC) were placed at serial No. 8 and 10 and the private respondents Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, who were promoted to the same cadre were placed at serial No. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9. Being aggrieved by the placement of the respondent Nos. 5 to 8 above the petitioner No.1 and by placement of respondent No. 5 to 9, above the petitioner No. 2, the two petitioners in WP(C)/62 of 2019 came
G.S. Lamba v. Union of India reported in (1985) 2 SCC 604
Jagdish Ch Patnaik v. State of Orissa reported in (1998) 4 SCC 456
K. Ajit Babu & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors. - 1997 (6) SCC 473
K. Megachandra Singh v. Ningam Siro reported in (2020) 5 SCC 689
Union of India and Others v. N.R.Parmar and Others reported in (2012) 13 SCC 340
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.