SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1052

NANI TAGIA
Otul Borgoahin, S/o Lt. Bhogeshwar Borgohain – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ninnong Ratan Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned Amicus Curiae appearing for the accused/appellant and Mr. J. Tsering, learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.

2. This Jail appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment & order dated 29.01.2020, passed by the learned Sessions Court at Tezu, in Session Case No.28(LDV)/2018(State Vs. Otul Borgohain), sentencing the accused/appellant to undergo an imprisonment for a term of 6(six) years for the offence held to be committed under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution, briefly stated, are as follows:

    (i) An FIR dated 30.04.2018 was lodged by the husband of the victim before the Officer-in-Charge, Roing Police Station, informing that on 30.04.2018 at around 3.00 PM, while his wife(victim) went to Kangkong Pathar for bringing their cows; suddenly, the accused committed rape on the victim forcefully by blocking her mouth and brutally beaten her.

    (ii) The aforesaid FIR was received on 01.05.2018, and the Roing P.S. Case No.19/2018, under Sectio


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top