IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, ITANAGAR BENCH
S.K. Medhi, Parthivjyoti Saikia, JJ.
Gomia Mura S/o Late Lodho Mura – Petitioner
Versus
The State of AP represented by the PP of AP – Respondent
CRL.A(J) 8 of 2020
Decided On : 26-07-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302, 376 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 164 – Undergo rigorous imprisonment for life – Offence of murder – Offence of rape – Criminal Case – Challenge in this appeal is to judgment passed by learned Sessions Judge, East Sessions Division, in Sessions Case – Held, Court are of opinion that chain of circumstances is complete circumstances appearing against appellant are proved beyond all reasonable doubt – Regarding confessional statement, it is a settled position of law that such a statement on its own does not prove an offence against an accused in a criminal case – It is prosecution side which has duty to prove an offence against an accused – Confessional statement amounts to an additional circumstance in chain of circumstances appearing against appellant – Court hereby hold that learned trial court correctly appreciated evidence and arrived at a correct finding – Court do not find any reason to interfere with impugned judgment – Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Parthivjyoti Saikia, J.
Heard Mr. A. Apang, learned Amicus Curiae appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor representing the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 21.08.2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tezu, East Sessions Division, Arunachal Pradesh in Sessions Case No.93/CLG/2014. By the impugned judgment, the trial court has convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.
3. On 10.03.2014 at about 6 P.M., late Joshi Mura, aged about 40 years, went to the house of Smti. Rupa Mura in order to attend a religious function. That day, she did not return home. Next day, i.e. on 11.03.2014 at about 12 noon, Shri Amit Mura, the son of late Joshi Mura, discovered her dead body, which was lying in an agricultural field near Kusum Pathar Shiv Mandir. Amit Mura noticed that the dead body of his mother had some injuries also. Amit Mura came to know that his mother was returning home on the previous night along with the present appellant (Shri Gomia Mora) who hailed to the same village. The appellant was found missing.
4. That day, Amit Mura immediately lodged the FIR before police narrating the aforesaid facts. The dead body of the deceased was subjected to post mortem examination. The doctor found the following injuries upon the dead body-
2. Bleedings from both the ears.
3. There was intra cranium haematoma over left temporal lobe.
4. Sub-dural haematoma over the temporal lobe.
5. Contusion on neck on both side and front measuring 7 cm X 3 cm.
6. Contusion over left shoulder joint.
7. Rigormortis fully developed and fixed.
8. Skin peeling off seen over left axilla (arms pit), right forearm, left iliac region (hip bone), right knee and left knee.
9. Haematoma on large intestine measuring 5 cm X 4 cm.
10. Bruise over left shoulder joint measuring 5 cm X 3 cm.”
The doctor opined that the death was due to subdural haematoma and intra-cerebral haematoma caused by blunt object on the head.
5. Police arrested the appellant on 03.06.2014. He gave a confessional statement under section 164 of the CrPC. His statement reads like this-
6. Finally, police filed the charge sheet against the appellant under Sections 376 and 302 of the IPC.
7. In order to prove the offences against the appellant, the prosecution examined 7 (seven) witnesses including the doctor who had conducted the post mortem examination and the police investigating officer. The appellant did not examine any witnesses.
8. On the basis of the evidence on record, the trial court arrived at the impugned finding.
9. We have carefully gone through the impugned judgment. We also considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.
10. The first witness to be examined is Smti. Pilki Mura. She knows the appellant as because at one point of time he used to reside in her village. She has stated in her evidence that on the day of occurrence, she was helping Rupa Mura in her house and the deceased was also helping Rupa Mura while solemnizing the
G. Parshwanath v. State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Chintappa Patil v. State of Maharashtra
The significance of motive in cases of circumstantial evidence, the burden of proof on the accused in cases of murder committed in secrecy inside a house, and the application of Section 106 of the Ev....
(1) Section 106 of Evidence Act does not directly operate against either a husband or wife staying under same roof and being last person seen with deceased.(2) In a case of circumstantial evidence, m....
It is well settled that in a case of circumstantial evidence, circumstances should be such so as to lead to only one irresistible conclusion, which is incompatible with innocence of accused.
Circumstantial evidence must form a conclusive chain linked to the accused, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with no viable alternative explanations for innocence.
The sufficiency of circumstantial evidence, the reliability of witness testimonies, and the application of the Last Seen Together Theory were central to the judgment. The court emphasized the need fo....
The court upheld the conviction based on established circumstantial evidence, affirming that all necessary conditions for such conviction were met.
The burden of proof lies on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases based on circumstantial evidence. The need for conclusive proof of each circumstance and th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.