SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, ITANAGAR BENCH
S.K. Medhi, Parthivjyoti Saikia, JJ.
Gomia Mura S/o Late Lodho Mura – Petitioner
Versus
The State of AP represented by the PP of AP – Respondent
CRL.A(J) 8 of 2020
Decided On : 26-07-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Apang, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: T. Ete, Addl. Public Prosecutor, State of Arunachal Pradesh.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302, 376 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 164 – Undergo rigorous imprisonment for life – Offence of murder – Offence of rape – Criminal Case – Challenge in this appeal is to judgment passed by learned Sessions Judge, East Sessions Division, in Sessions Case – Held, Court are of opinion that chain of circumstances is complete circumstances appearing against appellant are proved beyond all reasonable doubt – Regarding confessional statement, it is a settled position of law that such a statement on its own does not prove an offence against an accused in a criminal case – It is prosecution side which has duty to prove an offence against an accused – Confessional statement amounts to an additional circumstance in chain of circumstances appearing against appellant – Court hereby hold that learned trial court correctly appreciated evidence and arrived at a correct finding – Court do not find any reason to interfere with impugned judgment – Dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Parthivjyoti Saikia, J.

Heard Mr. A. Apang, learned Amicus Curiae appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor representing the State of Arunachal Pradesh.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 21.08.2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tezu, East Sessions Division, Arunachal Pradesh in Sessions Case No.93/CLG/2014. By the impugned judgment, the trial court has convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.

3. On 10.03.2014 at about 6 P.M., late Joshi Mura, aged about 40 years, went to the house of Smti. Rupa Mura in order to attend a religious function. That day, she did not return home. Next day, i.e. on 11.03.2014 at about 12 noon, Shri Amit Mura, the son of late Joshi Mura, discovered her dead body, which was lying in an agricultural field near Kusum Pathar Shiv Mandir. Amit Mura noticed that the dead body of his mother had some injuries also. Amit Mura came to know that his mother was returning home on the previous night along with the present appellant (Shri Gomia Mora) who hailed to the same village. The appellant was found missing.

4. That day, Amit Mura immediately lodged the FIR before police narrating the aforesaid facts. The dead body of the deceased was subjected to post mortem examination. The doctor found the following injuries upon the dead body-

    “1. There was scalp haematoma on the left temporal region.

2. Bleedings from both the ears.

3. There was intra cranium haematoma over left temporal lobe.

4. Sub-dural haematoma over the temporal lobe.

5. Contusion on neck on both side and front measuring 7 cm X 3 cm.

6. Contusion over left shoulder joint.

7. Rigormortis fully developed and fixed.

8. Skin peeling off seen over left axilla (arms pit), right forearm, left iliac region (hip bone), right knee and left knee.

9. Haematoma on large intestine measuring 5 cm X 4 cm.

10. Bruise over left shoulder joint measuring 5 cm X 3 cm.”

The doctor opined that the death was due to subdural haematoma and intra-cerebral haematoma caused by blunt object on the head.

5. Police arrested the appellant on 03.06.2014. He gave a confessional statement under section 164 of the CrPC. His statement reads like this-

    “On 10/03/2014 at about 2.30 PM I met my aunty Smti Late Joshi Mura in DOHA Party (Death Ceremony) at the residence of Shri Rupa Mura, village Dibrujan and after there for 10(ten) minutes we went out to the residence of Shri Binod in search of wine. There we got 1(one) bottle local made wine of GUR/RICE. We shared the wine and at around 8.25 pm we left for home. While going for home on way she asked me for Rs. 100/-to have wine. I refused to pay her and on refusal she slap me hard on my face. Out of raged (anger) by her slap and intoxication I pulled down her to the ground and then raped her. After the rape she said to tell it to villagers and public which irritates me more and I strangulated her to death by the white towel carried with her. Thereafter, I went to my sister’s house, Smti Lodhi, village Khoriajan.”

6. Finally, police filed the charge sheet against the appellant under Sections 376 and 302 of the IPC.

7. In order to prove the offences against the appellant, the prosecution examined 7 (seven) witnesses including the doctor who had conducted the post mortem examination and the police investigating officer. The appellant did not examine any witnesses.

8. On the basis of the evidence on record, the trial court arrived at the impugned finding.

9. We have carefully gone through the impugned judgment. We also considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

10. The first witness to be examined is Smti. Pilki Mura. She knows the appellant as because at one point of time he used to reside in her village. She has stated in her evidence that on the day of occurrence, she was helping Rupa Mura in her house and the deceased was also helping Rupa Mura while solemnizing the

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top