SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 531

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, ROBIN PHUKAN
Faijur Rahman @ Faizar Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. A R SIKDAR

JUDGMENT :

A.M. Bujor Barua, J.

Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 6, being the Union of India and the State Coordinator of NRC, respectively. Also heard Mr. G. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 and 4, being the authorities in the Home Department; Mr. N.K. Das, learned counsel for the respondent No.3, being the Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri and Mr. A.I. Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5, being the authorities in the Election Commission of India.

2. The petitioner Faijur Rahman @ Faizar Rahman was referred to the Foreigners’ Tribunal No. 7, Dhubri at Bilasipara for rendering an opinion as to whether he is a person who had entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971 and accordingly F.T. 7th Dhubri Case No. 14/BLP/18 corresponding to F.T. Case No. 1717/BLP/11 was registered. The Tribunal rendered its opinion dated 28.06.2018 arriving at its conclusion that the petitioner is a foreigner who had entered the State of Assam on or after 25.03.1971. Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.

3. In the writ proceeding, the petitioner relies upon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top