IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Nelson Sailo, J.
Sri. Hanglong Wangham and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Nagaland and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/145 of 2022
Decided On : 24-03-2023
Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978 - Section 16 &, 17 and 20 - Tenure - Appointment order - Challenged - Petitioners is that as tenure of incumbent members and Chairman of Village Council was due to expire, selection of new members was required to be made for tenure 2021 to 2026 and for that a meeting was scheduled - Meeting was rescheduled on account of appeal made by public so as to drop some of Village Council members from respective (Sector) - As scheduled, meeting was held on wherein, 4 names were drop and likewise, 5 names were drop - After dropping 9 names, as many as 18 names were shortlisted and selected as Village Council members - 18 names were sent to State Government for approval and accordingly, vide communication dated, 18 names were approved as Village Council members of village - Whether a member of Village Council has been subject to disqualification, question should be referred for decision of State Government and whose decision thereon shall be final – Held, Accordingly, enquiry was done and a report prepared on proceeding which was undertaken - It is seen that provisions of Section 16, 17, 20 part from Section 20 has been adhered to by respondent authorities concerned - In view of findings arrived at, Court do not find it necessary to refer - Court in that case had observed that role of State Government under Section 16 & 17 of VC Act should not be usurp by Court whereas in present case, State respondents have already taken their decision which is found to be sustainable and the question of usurping role of State Government would not arise - Writ petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. H. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Moa Imchen, learned Senior Govt. Advocate appearing for the State respondent Nos. 1 to 8 and Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent No. 9 to 22.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the communication dated 25.04.2022 (Annexure -VII) by which the State Government in the Home Department communicated the approval of the State Government on the updated list of Village Council members of Nokyang village and also the disqualification of its Village Council members to the Commissioner, Nagaland, Kohima. The petitioners have also challenged the appointment order of the respondent No. 9 issued on 08.06.2022 (Annexure -VIII) by the Deputy Commissioner, Mon District appointing the respondent No. 9 as the Village Council Chairman of the Nokyang village for the tenure 2021 – 2026 with immediate effect.
3. Brief facts of the case as projected by the petitioners is that as the tenure of the incumbent members and Chairman of Nokyang Village Council was due to expire, selection of new members was required to be made for the tenure 2021 to 2026 and for that a meeting was scheduled on 28.03.2021. However, the meeting was rescheduled for 08.04.2021 on account of the appeal made by the public so as to drop some of the Village Council members from the respective Morung (Sector). As scheduled, the meeting was held on 08.04.2021 wherein, 4 names were drop from Amayong Morung and likewise, 5 names were drop from Thamseayong Morung. After dropping the 9 names, as many as 18 names were shortlisted and selected as Village Council members. The 18 names were sent to the State Government for approval and accordingly, vide communication dated 17.06.2021 (Annexure -II), the 18 names were approved as Village Council members of Nokyang village. From amongst the 18 names, the name of Sh. Ponwang Konyak was selected by the Village Council members as the Chairman of the Village Council.
4. However, while such was the position, a circular dated 28.07.2021 (Annexure -IV) was issued by the Extra Assistant Commissioner (EAC), Office of the Addl. Deputy Commissioner, Tizit, Nagaland directing the Ahng/GBs/Morung President and members to be present in their respective Morungs on 30.07.2021 from 11 am onwards for conducting of selection/election Village Council members in Nokyang village as directed by the Deputy Commissioner, Mon District, Mon. Pursuant to the circular, although no meeting was held on 30.07.2021, the State Government in the Home Department vide the impugned communication dated 25.04.2022 approved the updated list of Village Council members and also approved the disqualification of the 12 village council members. Thereafter, vide the impugned appointment order dated 08.06.2022, the respondent No. 9 was appointed as the Village Council Chairman of Nokyang Village Council. Aggrieved, the petitioners are before this Court.
5. Mr. H. Rahman, learened counsel for the petitioners submits that the disqualification of the Village Council members who were selected as per the meeting minutes dated 28.03.2021 is in violation of the Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978 (VC Act). He submits that Section 16 of the VC Act provides for the conditions under which a Village Council member can be disqualified. He submits that the said provision can be invoked prior to the approval given by the Government on the selected Village Council members and not after approval is given by the Government. In other words, he submits that Section 16 comes into play prior to the approval given by the State Government and not post-approval. He further submits that Section 9 of the VC Act provides for the powers of the State Government to remove members of the Village Council but in the instant case, this provision has not been invoked. The learned counsel further submits that under the VC Act, the Deputy Commissioner or the Government do not have the power to appoi
The statutory mandate of Section 20 of the Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978 should not be overlooked in disputes over the selection of Village Council Members.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the replacement of a selected Village Council Member must be based on statutory grounds and due process, as provided in the Nagaland Village C....
The main legal point established is that the selection of Village Council Members must be in accordance with prevailing customary practices and usages, and should involve consultation with the whole ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Village Council to choose a Chairman as per Section 7(1) of the Nagaland Village Councils Act, 1978, and the impact of the ....
When a statutory functionary makes an order based on certain grounds, its validity must be judged by the reasons so mentioned and cannot be supplemented by fresh reasons in the shape of affidavit or ....
The selection of Village Council Members must comply with customary practices and the Nagaland Village Councils Act, ensuring fair representation of all clans regardless of household numbers.
The Court established that removal from office must be preceded by a show cause notice and an opportunity to defend, aligning with principles of natural justice.
The Deputy Commissioner's decision regarding VDB member selection must be reasonable and based on evidence of majority support from clans.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.