IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Smti Bulima Begum, W/o. Sri Anowar Hussain - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Assam, Panchayat & Rural Development & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 6551 of 2022
Decided On : 25-05-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, 243C, [4] - Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 - Section 6[1][b], 18[5], 13[2][d], 15, [1], 17, 32 [1], 65 - Assam Panchayat [Constitution] Rules, 1995 - Rule 46, 48, 50 - Panchayat - Motion of no confidence - Allow to continue and perform functions of President - Sought for directions in nature of mandamus to respondent authorities to cancel/withdraw and/or not to give effect to notice issued by President of Panchayat and for a direction to allow petitioner to continue and perform functions of President of Panchayat – Vice-President and two members of jurisdictional Anchalik Panchayat were unauthorisedly present and took part in deliberations held for motion of no confidence - Para 34.
Finding of the Court: Special meetings were not properly held and on both occasions, a resolution was passed against petitioner by more than requisite two-third majority of total number of Ward Members of a Gaon Panchayat, but interfered with later on, Court is of view that a direction is called for in case in hand because motion of no confidence is not lost and still survives - It is, therefore, directed that a special meeting to discuss motion of no confidence against petitioner shall be held under chairmanship of President - In order to ensure a free and fair voting process by way of secret ballots, Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri shall depute one Gazetted Officer under him not below Class-I Gazetted Officer for supervision - Petitioner as President of Gaon Panchayat and respondent nos. 7 – 15 as Ward Members of Gaon Panchayat are directed to participate in special meeting - As all of them are parties in proceedings, issuance of any further notice for special meeting is dispensed with - It is observed that until special meeting to discuss motion of no confidence against petitioner is held and decided status quo as on date will continue.
Result: Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been instituted by the petitioner assailing the proceedings of a special meeting held at 11-00 a.m. on 17.09.2022 in the office of Hatidhura Anchalik Panchayat to discuss a motion of no confidence brought against the petitioner as the President of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat on the basis of a requisition notice submitted by 8 [eight] nos. of Ward Members of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat on 18.07.2022 expressing want of confidence in the petitioner to continue as the President of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat and requesting the respondent no. 5 i.e. the Secretary of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat to convene a special meeting. The petitioner has also sought for directions in the nature of mandamus to the respondent authorities to cancel/withdraw and/or not to give effect to the notice dated 14.09.2022 issued by the President of Hatidhura Anchalik Panchayat [the respondent no. 4] and for a direction to allow the petitioner to continue and perform the functions of the President of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat.
2. The sequence of events leading to the institution of the present writ petition can be exposited, in brief, as follows :-
2.1. In the General Panchayat Election held on 09.12.2018, the petitioner contested for the post of President of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat. The results of the election were declared on 14.12.2018 and the petitioner got elected to the post of President of Chotoguma Gaon Panchayat [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Gaon Panchayat’, at places, for convenience] as per the provisions of Section 6[1][b] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended. In the said General Panchayat Election, the respondent nos. 6 – 15 also got themselves elected as Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat. After the election, the respondent no. 6 got elected as the Vice-President of the Gaon Panchayat in terms of the provisions of Section 6[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended, in the first meeting of the Gaon Panchayat held on 06.02.2019.
2.2. On 18.07.2022, 8 [eight] nos. of Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat submitted a requisition notice addressing the same to the President of the Gaon Panchayat i.e. the petitioner expressing want of confidence in her as President of the Gaon Panchayat and seeking convening of a special meeting within 15 days from the date of receipt of the requisition notice to discuss the motion of no confidence. The requisition notice dated 18.07.2022 was received by the respondent no. 5 on 19.07.2022 under his signature and seal.
2.3. It was the contention of the petitioner that despite receipt of the requisition notice by the respondent no. 5 on 19.07.2022, he did not bring the same to the notice and knowledge of the petitioner. It was also contended that the Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat also did not bring the requisition notice to the notice and knowledge of the petitioner. As a result, the petitioner was completely unaware about the requisition notice dated 18.07.2022 till 17.09.2022.
2.4. The Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat, that is, the respondent no. 5 had referred the matter including the requisition notice to the President of Hatidhura Anchalik Panchayat by his letter dated 02.08.2022 mentioning inter alia that despite visits of the office peon to the residence of the petitioner, the requisition notice could not be served upon the petitioner for approval to convene the special meeting. By the letter dated 02.08.2022, the respondent no. 5 sought intervention of the President of Hatidhura Anchalik Panchayat for convening the special meeting by taking necessary steps.
2.5. On receipt of the letter dated 02.08.2022 from the respondent no. 5, the Executive Officer of the Hatidhura Anchalik Panchayat [the respondent no. 3] issued a notice dated 06.08.2022 to the petitioner, the Ward Members of the Gaon Panchayat and other officials informing them that the no confidence motion brought against the petitioner would be discussed in a meeting convene
Padmini Singha vs. State of Assam and others
Dhirendra Chandra Das and others vs. State of Assam and others
Forhana Begum Laskar vs. State of Assam and others
Laxmi Singh and others vs. Rekha Singh and others
Karun Kanti Malakar and others vs. Nosir Ahmed Mazumdar and others
By Clause [4] of Article 243C, right to vote in meeting of Panchayat has been made limited to Chairperson of a Panchayat and other members of a Panchayat whether or not chosen by direct election from....
The Notice for the special meeting was found to be in violation of the statutory prescription of 3 clear days' notice as per Section 17[3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994.
Point of Law : Duty of the Chairman/Vice-Chairman to face the no-confidence motion, as they were elected office-bearers and if they had lost the confidence of the majority to continue as such office-....
Point of Law : Waiver is a question of conduct and can be determined on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Point of Law : Section 17 [3] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 has clearly stipulated that in case of any special meeting [which is a meeting for no confidence motion], 3 [three] days' clear notice h....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.