IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KARDAK ETE, J.
Rongmei Council, Nagaland Represented by its President Sri. Chinkhiulung Gonmei – Appellant
Versus
The State of Nagaland – Respondent
WP(C) 214 of 2017
Decided on : 29-09-2023
Recognition - Rongmei Tribe - Constitution (Nagaland) Scheduled Tribes Order, 1970, Article 342 - The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the withdrawal of recognition of Rongmei as one of the Naga tribes in the State of Nagaland. The court held that the Rongmei tribe is not a recognized scheduled tribe in the state of Nagaland as per the Constitutional (Nagaland) Scheduled Tribes Order, 1970. The court emphasized that only the Parliament has the authority to include or exclude any tribe or tribal community from the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in the notification issued under Article 342 of the Constitution of India. The court referred to the judgment in State of Maharashtra Vs. Milind And Ors (2001) 1 SCC 4, which held that no authority other than the Parliament has the power to modify, amend, or alter the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in the notification issued under Article 342.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the withdrawal of recognition of Rongmei as one of the Naga tribes in the State of Nagaland. The petitioner argued that the recognition was already established historically and through a lengthy process of discussions, negotiations, and consideration of objections. The State Cabinet had recognized the Rongmei tribe as one of the Naga tribes in 2012, but later withdrew the recognition in 2017.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the Rongmei tribe is not a recognized scheduled tribe in the state of Nagaland as per the Constitutional (Nagaland) Scheduled Tribes Order, 1970. The court emphasized that only the Parliament has the authority to include or exclude any tribe or tribal community from the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in the notification issued under Article 342 of the Constitution of India.
Issues: The main issue was the withdrawal of recognition of Rongmei as one of the Naga tribes in the State of Nagaland.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Rongmei tribe is not a recognized scheduled tribe in the state of Nagaland as per the Constitutional (Nagaland) Scheduled Tribes Order, 1970. The court emphasized that only the Parliament has the authority to include or exclude any tribe or tribal community from the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in the notification issued under Article 342 of the Constitution of India.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the withdrawal of recognition of Rongmei as one of the Naga tribes in the State of Nagaland.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. K. Alin Rongmei, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. L. T. Sangtam, learned Additional AG assisted by Mr. Veto V. Zhimomi, learned Government Advocate for the State of Nagaland and Mr. Pfosekho Pfotte, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. None appears for respondent No. 4.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner had challenged the part of the Cabinet Decision 25.04.2017 and the State Government notification dated 26.04.2017 by which the recognition of Rongmei as one of the Naga tribes in the State of Nagaland vide notification dated 04.08.2012 has been withdrawn.
3. The petitioner, the Rongmei Council, is represented by its President, Shri. Chinkhiulung Gonmei. The facts projected by the petitioner are that historically, the Rongmei tribe in the then nomenclature of Kabui was already found recognized in 1891 Assam population census. Edward Trite Dalton in his Ethnology of Bengal, groups the Nagas broadly into two divisions-the Eastern and Western, separated by the river Dhansiri. Henry Dament, political Officer, Naga Hills in an official report of 1878-79 mentioned the existence of eighteen tribes, but the census of 1891 recognized the following nine tribes namely, Angami, Ao, Kabui, Kuchcha, Kezhemer, Lotha, Rengma and Sema. Therefore, it is the case of the petitioner that in fact the Rongmei does not need recognition which was already recognized when Naga Hills district was under the administrative control of Assam.
4. When the Nagaland attained statehood in 1963, necessity of recognition for Rongmei identity was greatly felt. Memorandums were submitted for recognition from various political leaders expressing grievances of the community. Thereafter, series of representation and reminders were submitted by the Rongmei council of Nagaland in various stages. Following submission of countless representations and memorandums, the Government of Nagaland through cabinet decision on 03.08.2007, vide notification No. HOME/SCTA A-6/2007 dated 28.09.2007 had decided to undertake verification and investigation on the legitimacy of Rongmei for its recognition as indigenous inhabitant of Nagaland and constituted a committee that consists of three members to take detailed enumeration of the Rongmei community whose names or ancestors names were entered in the electoral rolls of 1963 of the three districts of Kohima, Dimapur and Peren. The Committee had series of meetings for 5 years and conducted a minute verification of the Rongmei community whose names or their ancestors’ names entered in the electoral roll of 1963.
5. The Committee on receipt of the final enumerated list from the three districts and also consent and objections from various tribal organizations of village/municipal authority/concerned GBS/Local Administrative Officers/DC of a District/Rongmei Council of Nagaland, had recommended to the council of ministers and the Government of Nagaland. Following the decision of the cabinet meeting held on 23.07.2012, the State Government had declared recognition of Rongmei tribe as one of the Naga tribes of Nagaland and thereafter incorporated Rongmei tribe in the notification as one of the Naga Tribes of Nagaland.
6. According to petitioner the historical background of the petitioner tribe is to be taken into consideration. The Naga tribes call themselves by their tribal names. In the early period, the name Naga was not known but it was the outsiders like the Assamese, Bengali and Ahom, with whom they had very wide contract, gave this name to the tribes. For example, the tribes like Angami, Ao, Sema, Rongmei etc. are known by the outsider names and not by their own original names. The origin of the Naga tribes is shrouded in mystery and is encapsulated in folklores and legends. After examining various oral sources, it was concluded that the Nagas belong to the Mongoloid racial stock and that their original home was in central China. Originally Nagas were not known as tribes. The Naga tribes we
State of Orissa and Ors vs. Gopinath Dash and Ors reported in (2005) 13 SCC 495
State of U.P. Vs. Chaudhari Ran Beer Singh and Anr reported in (2008) 5 SCC 550
State of Maharashtra Vs. Milind And Ors reported in (2001) 1 SCC 4
GJ Fernandez vs. State of Mysore & Ors reported inAIR 1967 SC 1753
State of Maharashtra Vs. Milind And Ors reported in (2001) 1 SCC 4
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors reported in (2013) 4 SCC 465
Only the Parliament has the authority to include or exclude any tribe or tribal community from the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in the notification issued under Article 342 of the Constitution ....
Unilateral withdrawal of a recommendation for a Scheduled Tribe certificate without due process violates constitutional protections for Scheduled Tribes.
Recognition of villages in Nagaland requires adherence to established customary practices, necessitating 'No Objection Certificates' and compliance with the prescribed procedures outlined in the rele....
The court confirmed that the burden of proof for indigenous identity lies with the petitioner, reinforcing that DNA testing cannot be mandated without consent and administrative decisions must adhere....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a person migrating from one state to another does not carry their caste status to the migrating state, even if the same caste is recognized as....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the acceptance of tribe claims based on blood relations, the relevance of pre-Independence documents, the removal of area restrictions, and the cau....
A person who is not aggrieved by an order issued under the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community certificates Act, 1993, does not h....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.