SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1465

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Debasish Thakuria – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. H. Baruah.

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. H. Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

2. This Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Cr.P.C and/or 'the Code', for short] against an order dated 22.06.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class - II, Kamrup at Amingaon ['the trial court', for short] in N.I. Act case no. 11/2021, whereby, the learned trial court has allowed a petition being Petition no. 692/2022 filed by the complainant -respondent no. 2 seeking interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, as amended, by directing the petitioner who is the accused in N.I. Act case no. 11/2021, to pay 20% of the cheque amount to the complainant.

3. Issue notice, returnable in 4 [four] weeks.

4. As Mr. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has appeared and accepted notices on behalf of the respondent no. 1, no formal notices need to be issued to the said respondents. Mr. Barua shall furnish an extra copy of the revision petition along with the annexures, to Mr. Sarma within 3 [three] working days.

5. The p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top