SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2396

SURENDRA SINGH I
Avanish Kumar Gaur – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Krishna Kant Dubey,Santosh Kumar Dubey.
For the Respondents: G.A.,Dheeraj Kumar Singh.

JUDGMENT

Surendra Singh-I, J.

The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been preferred with a prayer to set aside the order dated 24.07.2023 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad in Criminal Revision No. 463 of 2023, Avnish Kumar Gaur v. State of U.P. and another as well as order dated 23.05.2023 passed by the Presiding Officer, Additional Court, Court No. 2, Ghaziabad in Complaint Case No. 1179 of 2022, Samleshwar v. Avnish Kumar and others, under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as "N.I. Act"), Police Station Sahibabad, District Ghaziabad.

2. Heard Shri Santosh Kumra Dubey, learned counsel for petitioners, Shri Dheeraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State.

3. As per averments made in the petition, the above mentioned complaint case was filed by respondent no. 2 against the petitioner under section 138 of N.I. Act about dishonouring of cheque. The petitioner was summoned vide order dated 30.11.2021 for trial under Section 138 N.I. Act. The Trial Court vide order dated 23.05.2023 directed the petitioner/accused, under section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top