IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
Millo Lalyang S/o Lt. Millo Tana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
Crl.Pet 21 of 2023
Decided on : 21-12-2023
Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceeding - Indian Penal Code - 330, 331, 323, 447, 379, 392, 34 - The court discussed the applicability of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the criteria for its application, and the protection it provides to public officers. It also considered the irregularities in the proceedings, the alteration of charges, and the principles to be borne in mind while considering an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a police officer, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the criminal proceeding against him under Section 330 of the Indian Penal Code. The case arose from allegations of physical assault and custodial torture against the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was not available to the petitioner for the alleged acts of mercilessly beating the respondent. It also noted irregularities in the proceedings but concluded that it was not a fit case for quashing the entire criminal proceeding.
Issues: The issues included the applicability of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, irregularities in the proceedings, and the alteration of charges under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles laid down in 'Amit Kapoor Vs. Ramesh Chander' and 'Sankaran Moitra Vs. Sadhna Das' to determine the applicability of Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the grounds for quashing criminal proceedings.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the Criminal Petition and vacated the interim order, finding no just ground for quashing the criminal proceeding. It directed the record of the case to be sent to the Registry of Itanagar Bench at Yupia and a copy of the judgment to be sent to the Trial Court.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. D. Laji, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh and Mr. M. K. Singh, the learned counsel for the private respondent.
2. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Millo Lalyang, praying for quashing of the CR Case No. 08/2020 under Section 330 of the Indian Penal Code, which was registered against the petitioner on the basis of an order dated 09.11.2020 passed in G. R. Case No. 54/2020 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hawai, Anjaw, Arunachal Pradesh.
3. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant criminal petition, in brief, are as follow: -
(i) That on the night of 15.07.2019 at about 10.00 pm, one Shri A Upendhar, HR & Administrative Officer of Sushee Infra & Mining Private Limited had informed the petitioner who was at that time posted as the Officer-in-Charge of Hayuliang Police Station, that some miscreants have physically assaulted the staff of their company at Dhanbari Hot Mix Plant Complex and when those miscreants were caught while they were dismantling the generator, the said miscreants fled away in a white coloured Bolero Pickup Van which was without any registration plate. Accordingly on receipt of the said information, the petitioner alerted the police guards at Khupa police check point. Later on, around 11.00 pm on the said date, the said Mr. Shri A. Upendhar again called the petitioner and informed him that the staff of the company have managed to apprehend four miscreants and the stolen generator was also found loaded in their vehicle. The apprehended miscreants were brought to Hayuliang Police Station at around 11.30 PM.
(ii) During the preliminary interrogation of the apprehended miscreants, it was revealed that when they were attempting to lift the stolen 63 KVA generator at Dhanbari Hot Mix Plant Complex, they were accosted by the employees of the company and the miscreants tried to physically assault the said employees of the company and even one of them tried to strangulate the driver Shri Anil Tegu. It also came out during preliminary interrogation that in order to overpower the miscreants there was a scuffle between the staff of the company and the apprehended miscreants and one of accused fell down on the hard surface of the road and sustained injury on his right hand and other miscreants also sustained some minor injuries during the scuffle.
(iii) Thereafter, on the next date an FIR was lodged by one Ashish Nair and on receipt of the written FIR from Shri Ashish Nair, Project Manager Sushee Infra & Mining Private Limited at about 12.00 hour on 16.07.2019, the Hayuliang P. S. Case No.09/2019 under Section 320/447/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered and thereafter, the three of the arrested accused persons were forwarded along with the victim to the hospital.
(iv) It is pertinent to mention herein that one of the apprehended miscreants namely, Bomliso Kri was found to be juvenile and therefore, he was allowed to go from the police station. It is also pertinent to mention herein that the petitioner has stated that on the previous day though injuries were found on the person of the apprehended miscreants including one Bomkey Kri i.e. respondent no. 3, however, they were not sent to the hospital for treatment as the petitioner was informed by one head constable, namely, CW Lohan that the entrance of the hospital is found to be closed and no medical staff is seen there.
(v) Thereafter, on completion of investigation in Hayuliang P. S. Case No.09/2019 charge sheet was laid against the accused person including respondent no. 3 under section 323/447/392/34 of the IPC.
(vi) In the meanwhile, the respondent no. 2 i.e., Smt. Jipemai Mepo Kri, who is the wife of the respondent no.3 namely, Bomkey Kri had lodged an FIR against the present petitioner alleging that the present petitioner had merc
Amit Kapoor Vs. Ramesh Chander reported in (2012) 9 SCC 460
D. Devaraja Vs. Owais Sabeer Hussain reported in (2020) 7 SCC 695
D.T. Virupakshappa Vs. C. Subhash reported in (2015) 12 SCC 231
Sankaran Moitra Vs. Sadhna Das and Another (2006) 4 SCC 584
State of Orissa Vs. Ganesh Chandra Jew
Sunil Mehta and Another Vs. State of Gujarat and Another
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. M.P. Gupta
Sushil Kumar Baruah Vs. Golok Chandra Kalita” reported in (2009) 2 GauLR 654
AI
The court emphasized that the necessity for prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. must be evaluated in the context of the trial, and allegations of misconduct by public servants do not automatical....
The court emphasized that the requirement for sanction under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. is a matter to be determined at trial, and inherent powers under Section 482 cannot quash proceedings based solely ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of sanction for prosecution as envisaged by Section 197(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the determination that the co....
The protection under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is not available to public servants who commit offenses that are not connected with the discharge of their official duties or who act in excess of their autho....
The requirement of prior sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC is crucial for prosecuting public servants for acts done in the discharge of their official duties, to protect them from malicious and ....
Public servants are entitled to protection under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C. when acting in the discharge of their official duties, and allegations against them must demonstrate a reasonable connectio....
Point of Law : Alleged indulgence of the officers in cheating, fabrication of records or misappropriation cannot be said to be in discharge of their official duty - Their official duty is not to fabr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.