JUDGMENT :

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.

Heard Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. Nishant Roy, the learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in Cr.M.P. No.579 of 2016, Cr.M.P. No.1008 of 2016 & Cr.M.P. No.1011 of 2016, Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in Cr.M.P. No.3385 of 2013 and on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2 in Cr.M.P. No.579 of 2016, Cr.M.P. No.1008 of 2016 & Cr.M.P. No.1011 of 2016, Mr. Sahil, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2 in Cr.M.P. No.3385 of 2013 and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra as well as Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondent-State in Cr.M.P. No.1011 of 2016, Cr.M.P. No.579 of 2016 and Cr.M.P. No.3385 of 2013 & Cr.M.P. No.1008 of 2016, respectively.

2. Cr.M.P. No.579 of 2016, Cr.M.P. No.1008 of 2016 and Cr.M.P. No.1011 of 2016-in all these three cases, the common complaint case is under challenge as well as the order taking cognizance and in Cr.M.P. No.3385 of 2013 there is F.I.R which is the consequence of the complaint case which are the subject matter in all three cases and in vi