IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.
Avadhesh Kumar Singh and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Department Of Secondary Education and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.6104 Of 2022
Decided On : 19-01-2024
Termination - Educational Institution - Assam Non-Government Educational Institution (Regulation and Management) Act, 2006, Section 15(3) - The court found that the termination of service of the respondent no. 5 was not sustainable on facts and in law. The impugned order of the Educational Tribunal was upheld, setting aside the illegal resolution dated 22.08.2007.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to quash the order of the Education Tribunal, Morigaon, which allowed the case of the respondent no. 5 challenging the termination of his service. The respondent no. 5 was removed from service by the School Managing Committee and the petitioners were appointed as the Headmaster of the school.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the termination of service of the respondent no. 5 was not sustainable on facts and in law. The impugned order of the Educational Tribunal was upheld, setting aside the illegal resolution dated 22.08.2007.
Issues: The main issue was the legality of the termination of service of the respondent no. 5 and the compliance with the provisions of the Assam Non-Government Educational Institution (Regulation and Management) Act, 2006.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the termination of service of the respondent no. 5 was not in compliance with the provisions of the Assam Non-Government Educational Institution (Regulation and Management) Act, 2006, particularly Section 15(3). The court also noted the absence of a formal termination order and due process in the disciplinary proceedings.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the impugned order of the Educational Tribunal was upheld. The court vacated the interim order and allowed the petitioner to draw up a fresh disciplinary proceeding against the respondent no. 5, if permissible by following the due process of law.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. N.J. Khataniar, learned standing counsel for the Secondary Education Department representing respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the private respondent no.5.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the order dated 20.08.2022, passed by the learned Education Tribunal, Morigaon in Education (T) Case No. 2/2016.
Case of the petitioners:
3. Bapuji High School at Jagiroad, which is a Hindi Medium School, was provincialised with effect from 01.01.2013 under the provisions of the Assam Venture Educational Institutions (Provincialisation of Services) Act, 2011 and accordingly, the service of Awadhesh Kumar Singh (petitioner no. 1) and other teaching and non-teaching staffs of the said school were provincialised. It is projected that the petitioner no. 1 was the founder Headmaster of the said school.
4. The petitioners have projected that the School Managing Committee (hereinafter referred to as ‘SMC’ for short) of Bapuji High School (Hindi Medium), Jagiroad the said school was reconstituted with the petitioner no. 2 as its President, which was approved by the respondent no. 3 on 15.05.2007.
5. It is projected that Ramanand Jha (respondent no. 5) was the senior-most teacher of Bapuji High School (Hindi Medium). The SMC, vide resolution dated 22.06.2001 allowed the respondent no. 5 to hold the charge of Headmaster of the said school and as Secretary of the SMC, he also entrusted him the responsibility of advertising to fill up the vacant post of Headmaster of the said school. However, on the ground of misappropriation of school funds, he was suspended by the School Managing Committee vide resolution dated 01.06.2007, which the respondent no. 5 had refused to accept. The said resolution was approved by the Inspector of Schools, Morigaon (respondent no.3) on 04.06.2007. The respondent no.3 then issued a show cause notice dated 05.06.2007 to the respondent no. 5, but he failed to respond to it within the stipulated time and the respondent no. 3 had intimated the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon about the same vide letter dated 12.06.2007. It is also projected that the school authorities had also issued communications dated 15.05.2007, 09.06.2007 and 16.06.2007 to the respondent no. 5 as reflected in peon book, which he refused to accept. As per the direction of the respondent no.3 vide letter dated 19.06.2007, the SMC is stated to have lodged an FIR against the respondent no. 5.
6. Thereafter, the respondent no. 5 was removed from service by the SMC by adopting a resolution in its General Meeting held on 22.08.2007, which is stated to have been passed in the presence of the respondent no. 5 and Smt. Sudha Jha, his wife as well as teacher of the said school. It is projected that the respondent no. 5 and his wife had put their signature along with others present.
7. Thereafter, the SMC, by a resolution dated 05.11.2007, had resolved to appoint the petitioner no. 1 as the Headmaster of the Bapuji High School (Hindi Medium). Accordingly, the petitioner no. 1 was appointed as the Headmaster of the said school on 30.11.2007.
8. In the meanwhile, vide letter dated 26.03.2008, the respondent no. 3 informed the President of SMC that in respect of removal and dismissal of the service of an employee, it may act as per the provision of the Assam Non-Government Educational Institutions (Regulation and Management) Act, 2006. Thereafter, the President of the SMC by letter dated 31.03.2008, informed the respondent no. 5 about the SMC resolution dated 22.08.2007, terminating the service of the respondent no. 5. Thereafter, the Inspector of Schools (respondent no.3) gave its approval to the appointment of the petitioner no. 1 as Headmaster of Bapuji High School (Hindi Medium) on 18.08.2008.
9. Thereafter, vide lett
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the termination of service of an employee in a non-Government educational institution must comply with the provisions of the Assam Non-Gove....
Point of Law : It would show that Commissioner and Secretary on basis of inconsistencies as regards multiple dates of appointment recorded in different official records had rejected claim of Petition....
Continuous service is essential for eligibility for provincialisation under the Assam Education Act, and valid termination negates claims for such benefits.
An uncommunicated termination is invalid, and continuous service is essential for provincialization under the relevant educational act.
The court established that eligibility for provincialization of teachers' services must be based on verified service records and seniority, as per the provisions of the relevant Act.
The Court established that seniority for provincialization of teachers' services must be determined based on accurate service records as per the Assam Education Act, 2017.
The actual duties performed by an employee should be considered over the nomenclature of their initial appointment, and the relaxation of provisions in the rules should be extended to similarly situa....
The appointment of public officials must adhere to the prescribed procedures and consider all eligible candidates, as per the relevant service rules.
The court affirmed that the petitioner, having been appointed prior to provincialization, has a right to regularization based on continuous service as established by credible documentation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.