THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.
Syed Faruk Hussain Khan, S/o - Late Hussain Uddin Khan – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam, Department Of School Education (Elementary) And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/2941 of 2024
Decided On : 04-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's appointment particulars and history. (Para 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. previous legal decisions affecting the case. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. recommendations and denial by high power committee. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments on service continuity and approval. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's analysis of evidence and authority's claims. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. decision to interfere with the prior rejection. (Para 13) |
| 7. final order on regularization and salary. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.
Heard Ms. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned Standing counsel for the Elementary Education department.
2. The primary challenge in this writ petition is to the impugned order dated 18.04.2023 passed by the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of School Education on 18.04.2023 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for regularization/provincialsation of his services.
3. The matter has a chequered history. The petitioner claims to be appointed by the order dated 15.01.1988 issued by the Headmaster Bhogpur M.E Madrassa according to the decision of the Managing Committee of that relevant point of time. The approval for the appointment of the petitioner came on 10.01.1992 approving the appointment order dated 15.01.1988. The school came to be provincialised in the year 1991 and since the particulars of the present petitioner had been dropped from the detailed particulars submitted for provincialisation at that point of time, the petitioner could not avail the benefits of provincialisation at that point of time. Several similarly situated persons had approached this Court by filing writ petitions, one of them being C.R No. 157/1998 titled Jiban Chandra Deka & Others-Versus- State of Assam & Others. The aforesaid writ petitions were disposed by directing the respondent authorities to frame a Committee to look into the grievances of the petitioner therein. The relevant portion of the order dated 01.09.2003 is reproduced herein below for a ready reference;
“6. in view of the above, this bunch of cases will stand now disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The cases of the petitioners in each of the cases will be considered in accordance with the norms, criteria and eligibility conditions prescribed by the policy document dated 13.1.2003 subject to the modification in Condition Nos.1 and 2, as stated above.
(ii) The Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam, shall within 7 days from today, constitute a Committee to examine the cases of the petitioners in the present bunch of case and such other cases, as may be referred to the said Committee, from time to time, by this Court. As the said Committee will be executing and implementing the policy decision taken by the state, this Court considers appropriate to leave it to the discretion of the Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam to decide on the composition of the Committee with the suggestion that the Committee may be a high powered Committee consisting of 3 members and the present Secretary to the Government of Assam, Education Department may act as the Member-Secretary
(iii) The Committee, upon due verification of the cases before it, shall within 6 months from the date of a constitution, prepare district wise lists of "dropped teachers" eligible for regularization in terms of the norms and criteria laid down as per direction No. above. The eligible persons, on being identified, shall be arranged in the district wise lists, in order of seniority.
(iv) Suitable adjustments in the placements assigned in the district wise lists, as may be required, upon consideration of such other cases which may be referred to the Committee in the future, shall be made by the Committee.
(v) Appointment against available posts in each district shall be made on the basis of the lists prepared.
(vi) All appointments made would be prospective but will carry the benefit of past services for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits.
6. All the writ petitions s
The court affirmed that the petitioner, having been appointed prior to provincialization, has a right to regularization based on continuous service as established by credible documentation.
The actual duties performed by an employee should be considered over the nomenclature of their initial appointment, and the relaxation of provisions in the rules should be extended to similarly situa....
The Court established that seniority for provincialization of teachers' services must be determined based on accurate service records as per the Assam Education Act, 2017.
The appellate authority must provide a reasoned decision based on all relevant materials, not solely on the petitioner's failure to appear at hearings.
A senior language teacher has the primary claim for provincialisation under the Assam Education Act, and failure to provide justifiable reasons for excluding such a claim is arbitrary.
Claim made by the respondent no. 9 that he was working in the Kurshakati M.E. Madrassa from 14.11.2006 till his name was entered as Headmaster w.e.f. 30.09.2011 in the DISE data does not inspire the ....
Continuous service is essential for eligibility for provincialisation under the Assam Education Act, and valid termination negates claims for such benefits.
Point of Law : Issue relating to the claim of provincialisation of the service of (a) Sahidur Islam (petitioner), (ii) Abdur Rashid Sk (respondent no. 7), and (iii) Abual Hussain Sk (respondent no.8)....
The court established that administrative negligence in record-keeping cannot justify the denial of provincialisation of service, ensuring equal treatment under the law.
The court established that eligibility for provincialization of teachers' services must be based on verified service records and seniority, as per the provisions of the relevant Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.