THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Kardak Ete, J.
Onom Saroh S/o Lt. Tanor Saroh - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of AP And Others Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of AP, Itanagar - Respondent
WP(C) No. 275 of 2020
Decided On : 09-04-2024
Pharmacist - Pay Scale Upgradation - Pharmacy Act, 1948 - 1948 Act - 6th CPC - 7th CPC
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Compounder in Arunachal Pradesh Police, sought pay scale upgrade at par with Pharmacists in the Health Department and Directorate of Prison, citing the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and 6th/7th CPC recommendations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the nomenclature 'Compounder' should have been changed to 'Pharmacist' as per the Pharmacy Act, 1948. It noted the pay scale upgrade for Pharmacists in other departments and directed the authorities to consider the petitioner's case for pay scale upgrade within a specified timeframe.
Issues: Nomenclature of 'Compounder' vs 'Pharmacist', Pay scale disparity, Compliance with Pharmacy Act, 1948, 6th and 7th CPC recommendations
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for equal treatment under Article 14 of the Constitution, highlighting the prohibition of arbitrary and discriminatory state action. It directed the authorities to consider the petitioner's case for pay scale upgrade in line with the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and relevant CPC recommendations.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the authorities were directed to place the petitioner's case for pay scale upgrade before the High Level Standing Committee within one month and complete the process within five months.
JUDGMENT & ORDER :
Heard Mr. D. Panging, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Riram, Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to upgrade the scale of pay of the petitioner as Compounder at par with the scale of pay of the Pharmacists of the Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of Arunachal Pradesh as well as the Pharmacists serving under the Directorate of Prison, Arunachal Pradesh, w.e.f. 18.12.2014, i.e. the date on which the Pharmacists of the Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of Arunachal Pradesh was granted Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- in PB-2, Rs. 9300-34,800/- and for granting of all consequential benefits to the petitioner w.e.f. 18.12.2014.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he is a degree holder in Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Sciences having passed out from Dibrugarh University in First Class in the year 2005 and is a registered Pharmacist under the Pharmacy Council of the State of Arunachal Pradesh and as such, is a registered Pharmacist under Section 31(a) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 1948 Act).
4. Pursuant to the advertisement dated 20.11.2006, issued for filling up of various posts including 1 (one) post of Compounder in Arunachal Pradesh Police, the petitioner was appointed as Compounder after due selection process in the Arunachal Pradesh Police vide order dated 05.10.2007 in the scale pay of Rs. 4500-125-7000/- per month plus other allowances as admissible from time-to-time. Accordingly, the petitioner joined his service at Primary Health Centre, Police Training Centre (PTC), Banderdewa.
5. It is contended that the 6th Central Pay Commission’s (CPC) recommendation came into force w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and a new concept of grade pay was introduced, which has been adopted by the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Accordingly, pursuant to the adoption of the 6th CPC recommendation, the Pharmacists of the Department Health & Family Welfare, Government of Arunachal Pradesh were granted the revised pay scale of Rs. 5200-20200 PB + GR Rs. 2800.
6. It is contended that pursuant to the 6th CPC recommendation, the Pharmacists serving under the Central Government and its various instrumentalities were being granted the revised pay scale of Rs. 9300-34,800 PB 2 + GP Rs. 4200. Accordingly, the Pharmacists serving under the Government of Arunachal Pradesh placed their grievance before the concerned authorities regarding the anomaly of pay vis-à-vis the Pharmacists serving under the Central Government and those serving under the Government of Arunachal Pradesh. The grievances was placed before the High Level Standing Committee (hereinafter referred to as HLSC), constituted for considering proposals for upgradation of pay scale/pay anomalies to various categories of employees. The HLSC recommended for removal of pay anomaly of the Pharmacists of the Department of Health & Family Welfare by upgrading the scale of pay of the Pharmacist under the Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of Arunachal Pradesh from the existing pay scale. Vide order dated 24.12.2014, issued by the Secretary (Health & Family Welfare), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, the scale pay of the Pharmacists of the Department of Health & Family Welfare was upgraded from the existing pay scale of Rs. 5200-20200+ GP Rs. 2800 to Rs. 9300-34,800 + GP Rs. 4200 under Pay Band-2 with effect from 18.12.2014. Vide another order dated 24.12.2014, in supersession of the earlier order was issued, which provided for removal of pay anomaly of Pharmacists under Health Department, Government of Arunachal Pradesh by introducing a new non-functional grade wherein, the entry grade “Grade Pay of Rs. 2800/- in PB-1, Rs. 5200-20,200/- will be upgraded to ‘Grade pay of Rs. 4200/- in PB-2, Rs. 9300-34800/- after completion of 2(two) years of continuous service as Pharmacist and the
AI
The court held that Diploma holders must receive a higher pay scale of Rs.1450-3710/- regardless of their appointment date, reinforcing equal pay for equal work and correcting historical administrati....
The principle of 'equal pay for equal work' applies to cases of unequal pay scales based on no classification or irrational classification, and persons discharging identical duties cannot be treated ....
Review jurisdiction is strictly limited to apparent errors in the record or new evidence; acceptance of a reduced pay scale upon appointment restricts subsequent claims for higher pay.
Courts defer pay structure determination to expert bodies like Pay Commissions; equal pay for equal work inapplicable without identical duties, qualifications, responsibilities despite historical par....
Employee entitlements to upgraded pay scales must be recognized from an earlier date when governmental anomalies exist, ensuring parity among similarly situated employees.
Upgraded pay scales for Inspectors/Superintendents notionally effective from 01.01.1996 (5th CPC date), actually from 21.04.2004 order date, ensuring parity with other departments and correcting anom....
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining equivalency and analogousness in pay scales for similar positions as per the decision of the Executive Council.
While Implementing scheme, difference in pay scales on account of grant of financial upgradation under old ACP Scheme (15.12.1998) under this scheme within same cadre shall not be construed as an ano....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.