VIJAY BISHNOI, N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Prafulla Govinda Baruah, S/o. Lt. Radha Govinda Baruah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Rep. By The Chief Secretary To The Govt. Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Vijay Bishnoi, J.) :
These two writ petitions are preferred by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Article 11 of Schedule 1 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 (Assam Amendment) brought into effect by the Assam Court Fees (Amendment) Act, 1950 in respect of levy of Court fee for grant of probate or letter of administration at the rate of 7% ad valorem where the value of properties exceeds Rs.5,00,000/-without there being any upper limit fixed.
2. Since both the writ petitions question validity of above referred provisions of law, the facts of the writ petition, WP(C) No.2919/2018 are taken into consideration for the sake of convenience.
3. On 17.05.2010, late Tulsi Govinda Barua, brother of the petitioner in WP(C) No.2919/2018, who expired on 17.11.2012, executed his last Will and Testament, and the petitioner, being named as the Executor in the Will, applied for grant of probate before the learned District Judge, Kamrup, Guwahati. Vide order dated 18.11.2013, the learned District Judge, Kamrup, Guwahati granted probate of the last Will subject to the payment of due Court fees on the present value of the prop
The Secretary, Government of Madras, Home Department & Anr. Vs. Zenith Lamp and Electrical Ltd.
P.M. Ashwathanarayana Setty & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Secretary to Government of Madrass Vs. P.R. Sriramulu & Anr.
The Indian Mica and Micanite Industries Ltd. v. The State of Bihar and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.