IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
(PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI)
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Sri Arup Borah, Son of Shri Tilok Borah - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by P.P. Assam and Anr. - Respondents
Crl. Appeal No.127 of 2023
Decided On : 21-06-2024
POCSO - Sexual Offences Against Minors - POCSO Act, Sections 6, 10; Cr.P.C. Section 374(3) - The court discussed the provisions of the POCSO Act, particularly Sections 6 and 10, which define penetrative sexual assault and sexual assault against minors, respectively. The court emphasized the necessity of establishing the victim's age as a child under the Act, referencing the Juvenile Justice Act for age determination. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the conclusion that the conviction was not warranted.
JUDGMENT :
(Robin Phukan, J.)
Heard Mr. R. Chetri, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Addl. P.P. for respondent No.1 and Ms. Meghali Barman for the respondents No. 2.
2. In this appeal, under section 374(3) Cr.P.C. the appellant, namely, Shri Arup Borah, has challenged the correctness or otherwise of the judgment and order, dated 03.03.2023, passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge, Majuli, in Special Case No.36/2020, under section 6/10 of the POCSO Act, arising out of Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 16/2020. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and order, dated 03.03.2023, the learned Special Judge, Majuli had convicted the appellant under Section 10 of the POCSO Act and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and also to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only, in default to suffer S.I. for one month.
3. The background facts, leading to filing of the present appeal, are adumbrated herein below:-
Thereafter, she had instituted one complaint case; being Complaint Case No. 05/2020, before the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Majuli on 11.02.2020. But, the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Majuli had forwarded the said complaint to the Officer-in-Charge, Jengraimukh P.S. for registering a case and to investigate the same. Upon receipt of the said complaint, the Officer-in-Charge Jengraimukh P.S. had registered a case, being Jengraimukh P.S. Case No. 16/2020, under sections- 366/376(2)(1)/323/506/34 I.P.C., read with section 6 of the POCSO Act, on 15/02/2020, and endorsed S.I. Kalyan Gogoi to investigate the case. The I.O. then visited the place of occurrence, examined the witnesses and drew sketch map of the place of occurrence. The I.O. also got the victim examined by Doctor and collected the report and also got her statement recorded in the court under Section 164 Cr.P.C. He also arrested accused Papu Borah and forwarded him to the court. Then on completion of investigation, the I.O. laid charge sheet, against accused Papu Borah to stand trial in the court under Section 363 IPC read with section 4 of the POCSO Act and prayed for discharging accused Arup Borah and Smti. Numali Borah from the liability of the case.
Upon the said charge sheet, the learned Special Judge, Majuli had issued notice to the informant and thereafter, had taken cognizance of the offence under Section 363 IPC, read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act against accused Papu Borah and Arup Borah and issued process to them. Thereafter, on appearance of accused persons the learned trial court, complying the provision of Section 207 Cr.P.C. and after hearing learned Advocates of both sides, had framed following charges against the Papu Borah as under:-
Firstly: That you, on 12.08.2019 and thereafter, at village Malong Gaon, under Jengraimukh P.S., committed penetrative sexual assault on the minor informa
The prosecution must establish the charges against an accused beyond a reasonable doubt, and any contradictions in the victim's testimony can undermine the reliability of the evidence, leading to a p....
The prosecution must establish the victim's age as below 18 years and provide corroborating evidence to prove charges under the POCSO Act.
The victim's testimony, if found reliable, can form the sole basis for conviction under the POCSO Act, and legal presumption against the accused places the burden of rebuttal on the defense.
Conviction and sentencing for sexual offences under the POCSO Act upheld, establishing that the defense's failure to challenge the victim's age and credibility supported the prosecution's case.
The judgment underscores the necessity of corroborative evidence in sexual assault cases, the importance of establishing the victim's age under the POCSO Act, and the need for reliable witness testim....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.