Back
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Malamoni Kalita W/o Lt Bakul Chandra Kalita – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging, inter alia the rejection of the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground which has been done by the State Level Committee (hereinafter SLC) in its meeting dated 07.06.2017 and again on 04.05.2018.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell is that her husband, Bakul Chandra Kalita, who was working as Senior Accounts Assistant, Sub-Treasury Office, Kaliabor had died in harness on 08.09.2013. The petitioner who claims to be eligible had applied for appointment on compassionate ground and the District Level Committee (DLC), Nagaon had recommended the name of the petitioner to the SLC on 03.03.2015. The SLC however, rejected the case of the petitioner on 07.06.2017 on the ground of overage. On representation of the petitioner, her case was placed before the SLC a second time on 04.05.2018 when once again, her case was rejected.
3. I have heard Shri A. Chamuah, learned counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam an
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly; significant delays dilute the urgency of financial need.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and is meant to address immediate financial crises. The sense of immediacy is diluted and lost in cases of prolonged delay, and compassionate appointme....
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment procedures and must be made promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays undermine this objective.
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as the sense of urgency is lost.
Appointment on compassionate ground is not a matter of any vested right and is not a source of recruitment. Prolonged delay dilutes the sense of immediacy in granting compassionate appointment.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions meant for immediate relief and not vested rights; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and should be provided immediately to redeem the family in distress. Delay in seeking compassionate appointment and changed financial circumstances may....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
